|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] AGP problems with 2.0.5
On 14 Mar 2005, at 12:26, Kurt Garloff wrote:
I think the correct fix is to extend the Linux interface with
something
like a io_remap_pfn_range, or an extra 'is_ram' flag to
remap_pfn_range. We then already have (almost) an implementation -- we
just recycle io_remap_page_range. There are a lot of callers of
remap_pfn_range, each would need auditing, and we'd have to try to get
the patch checked in even though it only makes sense when running on
Xen.
Shouldn't we just use the __sparc__ code path in drm_vm.c:678, then ?
Well that would work short-term, but it doesn't generalise to all the
other drivers now using remap_pfn_range. Surely the maintainers would
appreciate an io_remap_ call that just does the right thing on all
architectures?
Sounds suitable as a short-term vendor/distro patch or
proof-of-concept. But we should think about cooking up our own,
cleaner, patch to push upstream.
In fact there are a bunch of generic-code patches in our sparse tree
that I think we should actually have as patches we apply to our
pristine tree at build time. Then we can have the aim of actively
pushing each of those single-purpose patches upstream and always strive
to get the patches subdir emptied.
Comments?
-- Keir
-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel
|
|
|
|
|