Hi Keir,
On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 09:34:02AM +0000, Keir Fraser wrote:
> I think the correct fix is to extend the Linux interface with something
> like a io_remap_pfn_range, or an extra 'is_ram' flag to
> remap_pfn_range. We then already have (almost) an implementation -- we
> just recycle io_remap_page_range. There are a lot of callers of
> remap_pfn_range, each would need auditing, and we'd have to try to get
> the patch checked in even though it only makes sense when running on
> Xen.
Shouldn't we just use the __sparc__ code path in drm_vm.c:678, then ?
Testing ...
Regards,
--
Kurt Garloff <kurt@xxxxxxxxxx> [Koeln, DE]
Physics:Plasma modeling <garloff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [TU Eindhoven, NL]
Linux: SUSE Labs (Director) <garloff@xxxxxxx> [Novell Inc]
pgpC3JIJTw6f3.pgp
Description: PGP signature
|
Home