[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v9 2/5] x86/asm, x86/boot: expose inline memcmp()
- To: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
- From: Mauricio Faria de Oliveira <mfo@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2026 18:06:21 -0300
- Authentication-results: eu.smtp.expurgate.cloud; dkim=pass header.s=20170329 header.d=igalia.com header.i="@igalia.com" header.h="Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:MIME-Version"
- Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxx>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, x86@xxxxxxxxxx, Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx>, Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@xxxxxxxxx>, Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx>, Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>, Brian Gerst <brgerst@xxxxxxxxx>, kernel-dev@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Delivery-date: Tue, 08 Sep 2026 21:07:12 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
On 2026-09-08 16:32, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 08, 2026 at 03:04:53PM -0300, Mauricio Faria de Oliveira wrote:
>> Boris, perhaps the approach here could be changed to add an actual
>> memcmp()-like inline implementation (e.g., as provided in a previous
>> revision, without return value differences), or continue with the
>> memeq()-like memcmp() from arch/x86/boot/ but rename it to memeq() ?
>
> Nah, new functionality is not needed. We can add it later when it is really
> needed.
Ack, and to confirm: not rename the existing one, either?
--
Mauricio
|
