[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v9 2/5] x86/asm, x86/boot: expose inline memcmp()
- To: Mauricio Faria de Oliveira <mfo@xxxxxxxxxx>
- From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2026 12:32:29 -0700
- Authentication-results: eu.smtp.expurgate.cloud; dkim=pass header.s=alien8 header.d=alien8.de header.i="@alien8.de" header.h="Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To"
- Authentication-results: mail.alien8.de (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (4096-bit key) header.d=alien8.de
- Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxx>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, x86@xxxxxxxxxx, Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx>, Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@xxxxxxxxx>, Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx>, Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>, Brian Gerst <brgerst@xxxxxxxxx>, kernel-dev@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Delivery-date: Tue, 08 Sep 2026 19:33:16 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
On Tue, Sep 08, 2026 at 03:04:53PM -0300, Mauricio Faria de Oliveira wrote:
> Boris, perhaps the approach here could be changed to add an actual
> memcmp()-like inline implementation (e.g., as provided in a previous
> revision, without return value differences), or continue with the
> memeq()-like memcmp() from arch/x86/boot/ but rename it to memeq() ?
Nah, new functionality is not needed. We can add it later when it is really
needed.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
|
