[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v3 2/7] x86/msi: Define extended destination ID masks and IO-APIC RTE fields


  • To: Julian Vetter <julian.vetter@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2026 18:09:52 +0100
  • Autocrypt: addr=jbeulich@xxxxxxxx; keydata= xsDiBFk3nEQRBADAEaSw6zC/EJkiwGPXbWtPxl2xCdSoeepS07jW8UgcHNurfHvUzogEq5xk hu507c3BarVjyWCJOylMNR98Yd8VqD9UfmX0Hb8/BrA+Hl6/DB/eqGptrf4BSRwcZQM32aZK 7Pj2XbGWIUrZrd70x1eAP9QE3P79Y2oLrsCgbZJfEwCgvz9JjGmQqQkRiTVzlZVCJYcyGGsD /0tbFCzD2h20ahe8rC1gbb3K3qk+LpBtvjBu1RY9drYk0NymiGbJWZgab6t1jM7sk2vuf0Py O9Hf9XBmK0uE9IgMaiCpc32XV9oASz6UJebwkX+zF2jG5I1BfnO9g7KlotcA/v5ClMjgo6Gl MDY4HxoSRu3i1cqqSDtVlt+AOVBJBACrZcnHAUSuCXBPy0jOlBhxPqRWv6ND4c9PH1xjQ3NP nxJuMBS8rnNg22uyfAgmBKNLpLgAGVRMZGaGoJObGf72s6TeIqKJo/LtggAS9qAUiuKVnygo 3wjfkS9A3DRO+SpU7JqWdsveeIQyeyEJ/8PTowmSQLakF+3fote9ybzd880fSmFuIEJldWxp Y2ggPGpiZXVsaWNoQHN1c2UuY29tPsJgBBMRAgAgBQJZN5xEAhsDBgsJCAcDAgQVAggDBBYC AwECHgECF4AACgkQoDSui/t3IH4J+wCfQ5jHdEjCRHj23O/5ttg9r9OIruwAn3103WUITZee e7Sbg12UgcQ5lv7SzsFNBFk3nEQQCACCuTjCjFOUdi5Nm244F+78kLghRcin/awv+IrTcIWF hUpSs1Y91iQQ7KItirz5uwCPlwejSJDQJLIS+QtJHaXDXeV6NI0Uef1hP20+y8qydDiVkv6l IreXjTb7DvksRgJNvCkWtYnlS3mYvQ9NzS9PhyALWbXnH6sIJd2O9lKS1Mrfq+y0IXCP10eS FFGg+Av3IQeFatkJAyju0PPthyTqxSI4lZYuJVPknzgaeuJv/2NccrPvmeDg6Coe7ZIeQ8Yj t0ARxu2xytAkkLCel1Lz1WLmwLstV30g80nkgZf/wr+/BXJW/oIvRlonUkxv+IbBM3dX2OV8 AmRv1ySWPTP7AAMFB/9PQK/VtlNUJvg8GXj9ootzrteGfVZVVT4XBJkfwBcpC/XcPzldjv+3 HYudvpdNK3lLujXeA5fLOH+Z/G9WBc5pFVSMocI71I8bT8lIAzreg0WvkWg5V2WZsUMlnDL9 mpwIGFhlbM3gfDMs7MPMu8YQRFVdUvtSpaAs8OFfGQ0ia3LGZcjA6Ik2+xcqscEJzNH+qh8V m5jjp28yZgaqTaRbg3M/+MTbMpicpZuqF4rnB0AQD12/3BNWDR6bmh+EkYSMcEIpQmBM51qM EKYTQGybRCjpnKHGOxG0rfFY1085mBDZCH5Kx0cl0HVJuQKC+dV2ZY5AqjcKwAxpE75MLFkr wkkEGBECAAkFAlk3nEQCGwwACgkQoDSui/t3IH7nnwCfcJWUDUFKdCsBH/E5d+0ZnMQi+G0A nAuWpQkjM1ASeQwSHEeAWPgskBQL
  • Cc: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>, Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>, Anthony PERARD <anthony.perard@xxxxxxxxxx>, Michal Orzel <michal.orzel@xxxxxxx>, Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>, Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx>, Julien Grall <julien@xxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Delivery-date: Tue, 10 Mar 2026 17:17:56 +0000
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>

On 09.03.2026 13:31, Julian Vetter wrote:
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/include/asm/hvm/vioapic.h
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/include/asm/hvm/vioapic.h
> @@ -32,6 +32,19 @@
>  #define VIOAPIC_EDGE_TRIG  0
>  #define VIOAPIC_LEVEL_TRIG 1
>  
> +/*
> + * Extract the destination ID from a 64-bit IO-APIC RTE, including the
> + * extended bits (55:49) used when XEN_HVM_CPUID_EXT_DEST_ID is advertised.
> + */
> +#define IO_APIC_REDIR_DEST_MASK         (0xffULL << 56)
> +#define IO_APIC_REDIR_EXT_DEST_MASK     (0x7fULL << 49)
> +
> +#define VIOAPIC_RTE_DEST_ID_UPPER_BITS  8

The name suggests this is the number of upper bits, which it isn't. You 
shouldn't
need this constant anyway, see below.

> --- a/xen/include/public/domctl.h
> +++ b/xen/include/public/domctl.h
> @@ -615,12 +615,14 @@ struct xen_domctl_bind_pt_irq {
>          struct {
>              uint8_t gvec;
>              uint32_t gflags;
> -#define XEN_DOMCTL_VMSI_X86_DEST_ID_MASK 0x0000ff
> -#define XEN_DOMCTL_VMSI_X86_RH_MASK      0x000100
> -#define XEN_DOMCTL_VMSI_X86_DM_MASK      0x000200
> -#define XEN_DOMCTL_VMSI_X86_DELIV_MASK   0x007000
> -#define XEN_DOMCTL_VMSI_X86_TRIG_MASK    0x008000
> -#define XEN_DOMCTL_VMSI_X86_UNMASKED     0x010000
> +#define XEN_DOMCTL_VMSI_X86_DEST_ID_MASK        0x0000ff
> +#define XEN_DOMCTL_VMSI_X86_DEST_ID_BITS        8

This constant is redundant with _MASK. It is generally helpful to avoid
such redundancies (especially in the public interface), and derive the wanted
value from the main (most generally usable) constant. IOW here maybe

#define XEN_DOMCTL_VMSI_X86_DEST_ID_BITS        8
#define XEN_DOMCTL_VMSI_X86_DEST_ID_MASK        ((1U << 
XEN_DOMCTL_VMSI_X86_DEST_ID_BITS) - 1)

But of course it could also be done the other way around, albeit in a public
header this may end up more difficult. (Generally the mask wants to be the
main definition, as everything else can be derived from them.)

> @@ -630,6 +632,10 @@ struct xen_domctl_bind_pt_irq {
>      } u;
>  };
>  
> +#define XEN_DOMCTL_VMSI_X86_FULL_DEST(gflags) \
> +        (MASK_EXTR((gflags), XEN_DOMCTL_VMSI_X86_DEST_ID_MASK) | \
> +        (MASK_EXTR((gflags), XEN_DOMCTL_VMSI_X86_EXT_DEST_ID_MASK) << \
> +         XEN_DOMCTL_VMSI_X86_DEST_ID_BITS))

There's no MASK_EXTR() in the public interface.

Also, nit: No need to parenthesize gflags when used in macro invocations like
this one. Iirc there was a similar pattern elsewhere in the patch.

Jan



 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.