|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: Consider changing CONFIG_ACPI default on ARM?
On 14.08.2025 23:27, Demi Marie Obenour wrote: > On 8/14/25 02:55, Jan Beulich wrote: >> On 06.08.2025 06:30, Elliott Mitchell wrote: >>> On Tue, Jul 01, 2025 at 10:01:13PM +0200, Paul Leiber wrote: >>>> >>>> Unfortunately, I don't have a direct answer to the question (as is so often >>>> the case, due to my limited knowledge and experience). However, I am >>>> successfully running Xen on a RPi 4 (mostly, except for some VLAN related >>>> networking issues). >>>> >>>> I used instructions in [1] to install vanilla Debian on the RPi, including >>>> UEFI boot and grub. I then compiled Xen with expert options and ACPI >>>> enabled. >>>> >>>> I don't know if there are better solutions. For example, I suffer from the >>>> fact that I2C doesn't work when using UEFI boot on a RPi. Nowadays, Debian >>>> provides their own vanilla Debian images for RPi and with working I2C, but >>>> these images are using a different boot method that I didn't know how to >>>> use >>>> with Xen. So far, the procedure described above seems to be the easiest >>>> solution for me. >>> >>> >>>> [1] https://forums.raspberrypi.com/viewtopic.php?t=282839 >>>> >>>> Am 30.06.2025 um 12:35 schrieb Sumit Semwal: >>>>> >>>>> I've just begun to experiment with the Raspberry Pi 5, trying to run a >>>>> simple xen + Dom0 setup, using uBoot, and the bookworm based Rpi >>>>> distro. >>>>> >>>>> I've tried combinations of the following setup: >>>>> >>>>> 1. prebuilt Rpi5 kernel + dtbs, and have also tried to build them from >>>>> source [1] >>>>> 2. Xen from upstream [2] and xen-troops [3] >>>>> 3. upstream uBoot from [4] >>>>> >>>>> but with the same result: [short log below; I can provide a fuller log >>>>> if needed] >>>>> >>>>> (XEN) DT: ** translation for device /axi/msi-controller@1000130000 ** >>>>> (XEN) DT: bus is default (na=2, ns=2) on /axi >>>>> (XEN) DT: translating address:<3> 000000ff<3> fffff000<3> >>>>> (XEN) DT: parent bus is default (na=2, ns=1) on / >>>>> (XEN) DT: walking ranges... >>>>> (XEN) DT: default map, cp=0, s=1000000000, da=fffffff000 >>>>> (XEN) DT: default map, cp=1000000000, s=100000000, da=fffffff000 >>>>> (XEN) DT: default map, cp=1400000000, s=400000000, da=fffffff000 >>>>> (XEN) DT: default map, cp=1800000000, s=400000000, da=fffffff000 >>>>> (XEN) DT: default map, cp=1c00000000, s=400000000, da=fffffff000 >>>>> (XEN) DT: not found ! >>>>> (XEN) Unable to retrieve address 1 for /axi/msi-controller@1000130000 >>>>> (XEN) Device tree generation failed (-22). >>>>> (XEN) debugtrace_dump() global buffer starting >>>>> 1 cpupool_create(pool=0,sched=6) >>>>> 2 Created cpupool 0 with scheduler SMP Credit Scheduler rev2 (credit2) >>>>> 3 cpupool_add_domain(dom=0,pool=0) n_dom 1 rc 0 >>>>> (XEN) wrap: 0 >>>>> (XEN) debugtrace_dump() global buffer finished >>>>> (XEN) >>>>> (XEN) **************************************** >>>>> (XEN) Panic on CPU 0: >>>>> (XEN) Could not set up DOM0 guest OS (rc = -22) >>>>> (XEN) **************************************** >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I'm certain I'm missing something, but before I delve deeper, I just >>>>> wanted to ask if this is a known issue, and if so, are there any >>>>> workarounds or solutions available for this? >>>>> >>>>> Any help about this is highly appreciated! >>>>> >>>>> Thanks and Best regards, >>>>> Sumit. >>>>> >>>>> [1]: https://github.com/raspberrypi/linux rpi-6.12.y branch >>>>> [2]: git://xenbits.xen.org/xen.git - main branch >>>>> [3] xen-troops https://github.com/xen-troops/xen - rpi5_dev branch >>>>> [4]: https://github.com/u-boot/u-boot.git master branch >>> >>> Ultimately Debian is choosing to leave most defaults alone. So far the >>> Xen developers have left CONFIG_ACPI defaulting to off on ARM*. The >>> Debian project doesn't have paid people to support Raspberry PI hardware, >>> despite being rather common. As a result there aren't any official >>> Raspberry PI images, but people associated with Tianocore have gotten >>> generic images to boot on Raspberry PI hardware. >>> >>> I'm unsure of the likelihood of getting the Debian maintainers to >>> override the default. Yet due being by far the simplest way to install >>> Debian and Xen on a very common ARM64 platform, perhaps the Xen >>> developers should consider changing? >> >> In an open source project everyone is a developer. There is a >> significant amount of work someone needs to pick up to change this >> SUPPORT.md entry: >> >> ### Host ACPI (via Domain 0) >> >> Status, x86 PV: Supported >> Status, ARM: Experimental >> >> Parties interested in changing the support status of any component are the >> primary candidates to actually carry out the necessary work. > > What is that work? To determine what exactly needs doing is part of the exercise. I, for one, am unaware of a concrete written down set of things which need doing. Jan
|
 |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |