[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: Consider changing CONFIG_ACPI default on ARM?
On 06.08.2025 06:30, Elliott Mitchell wrote: > On Tue, Jul 01, 2025 at 10:01:13PM +0200, Paul Leiber wrote: >> >> Unfortunately, I don't have a direct answer to the question (as is so often >> the case, due to my limited knowledge and experience). However, I am >> successfully running Xen on a RPi 4 (mostly, except for some VLAN related >> networking issues). >> >> I used instructions in [1] to install vanilla Debian on the RPi, including >> UEFI boot and grub. I then compiled Xen with expert options and ACPI >> enabled. >> >> I don't know if there are better solutions. For example, I suffer from the >> fact that I2C doesn't work when using UEFI boot on a RPi. Nowadays, Debian >> provides their own vanilla Debian images for RPi and with working I2C, but >> these images are using a different boot method that I didn't know how to use >> with Xen. So far, the procedure described above seems to be the easiest >> solution for me. > > >> [1] https://forums.raspberrypi.com/viewtopic.php?t=282839 >> >> Am 30.06.2025 um 12:35 schrieb Sumit Semwal: >>> >>> I've just begun to experiment with the Raspberry Pi 5, trying to run a >>> simple xen + Dom0 setup, using uBoot, and the bookworm based Rpi >>> distro. >>> >>> I've tried combinations of the following setup: >>> >>> 1. prebuilt Rpi5 kernel + dtbs, and have also tried to build them from >>> source [1] >>> 2. Xen from upstream [2] and xen-troops [3] >>> 3. upstream uBoot from [4] >>> >>> but with the same result: [short log below; I can provide a fuller log >>> if needed] >>> >>> (XEN) DT: ** translation for device /axi/msi-controller@1000130000 ** >>> (XEN) DT: bus is default (na=2, ns=2) on /axi >>> (XEN) DT: translating address:<3> 000000ff<3> fffff000<3> >>> (XEN) DT: parent bus is default (na=2, ns=1) on / >>> (XEN) DT: walking ranges... >>> (XEN) DT: default map, cp=0, s=1000000000, da=fffffff000 >>> (XEN) DT: default map, cp=1000000000, s=100000000, da=fffffff000 >>> (XEN) DT: default map, cp=1400000000, s=400000000, da=fffffff000 >>> (XEN) DT: default map, cp=1800000000, s=400000000, da=fffffff000 >>> (XEN) DT: default map, cp=1c00000000, s=400000000, da=fffffff000 >>> (XEN) DT: not found ! >>> (XEN) Unable to retrieve address 1 for /axi/msi-controller@1000130000 >>> (XEN) Device tree generation failed (-22). >>> (XEN) debugtrace_dump() global buffer starting >>> 1 cpupool_create(pool=0,sched=6) >>> 2 Created cpupool 0 with scheduler SMP Credit Scheduler rev2 (credit2) >>> 3 cpupool_add_domain(dom=0,pool=0) n_dom 1 rc 0 >>> (XEN) wrap: 0 >>> (XEN) debugtrace_dump() global buffer finished >>> (XEN) >>> (XEN) **************************************** >>> (XEN) Panic on CPU 0: >>> (XEN) Could not set up DOM0 guest OS (rc = -22) >>> (XEN) **************************************** >>> >>> >>> I'm certain I'm missing something, but before I delve deeper, I just >>> wanted to ask if this is a known issue, and if so, are there any >>> workarounds or solutions available for this? >>> >>> Any help about this is highly appreciated! >>> >>> Thanks and Best regards, >>> Sumit. >>> >>> [1]: https://github.com/raspberrypi/linux rpi-6.12.y branch >>> [2]: git://xenbits.xen.org/xen.git - main branch >>> [3] xen-troops https://github.com/xen-troops/xen - rpi5_dev branch >>> [4]: https://github.com/u-boot/u-boot.git master branch > > Ultimately Debian is choosing to leave most defaults alone. So far the > Xen developers have left CONFIG_ACPI defaulting to off on ARM*. The > Debian project doesn't have paid people to support Raspberry PI hardware, > despite being rather common. As a result there aren't any official > Raspberry PI images, but people associated with Tianocore have gotten > generic images to boot on Raspberry PI hardware. > > I'm unsure of the likelihood of getting the Debian maintainers to > override the default. Yet due being by far the simplest way to install > Debian and Xen on a very common ARM64 platform, perhaps the Xen > developers should consider changing? In an open source project everyone is a developer. There is a significant amount of work someone needs to pick up to change this SUPPORT.md entry: ### Host ACPI (via Domain 0) Status, x86 PV: Supported Status, ARM: Experimental Parties interested in changing the support status of any component are the primary candidates to actually carry out the necessary work. Jan
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |