[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH v3 09/11] vpci/rebar: Remove registers when init_rebar() fails
On Mon, Apr 21, 2025 at 02:19:01PM +0800, Jiqian Chen wrote: > When init_rebar() fails, the previous new changes will hide Rebar > capability, it can't rely on vpci_deassign_device() to remove all > Rebar related registers anymore, those registers must be removed > fini_rebar(). > > To do that, call vpci_remove_registers() to remove all possible > registered registers. > > Signed-off-by: Jiqian Chen <Jiqian.Chen@xxxxxxx> > --- > cc: "Roger Pau Monné" <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > v2->v3 changes: > * Use fini_rebar() to remove all register instead of in the failure path of > init_rebar(); > > v1->v2 changes: > * Called vpci_remove_registers() to remove all possible registered registers > instead of using a array to record all registered register. > > Best regards, > Jiqian Chen. > --- > xen/drivers/vpci/rebar.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----------- > 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/xen/drivers/vpci/rebar.c b/xen/drivers/vpci/rebar.c > index 026f8f7972d9..325090afb0f8 100644 > --- a/xen/drivers/vpci/rebar.c > +++ b/xen/drivers/vpci/rebar.c > @@ -49,6 +49,26 @@ static void cf_check rebar_ctrl_write(const struct pci_dev > *pdev, > bar->guest_addr = bar->addr; > } > > +static void fini_rebar(struct pci_dev *pdev) > +{ > + uint32_t ctrl; > + unsigned int nbars; > + unsigned int rebar_offset = pci_find_ext_capability(pdev->sbdf, > + > PCI_EXT_CAP_ID_REBAR); > + > + if ( !rebar_offset || !is_hardware_domain(pdev->domain) ) Maybe add an ASSERT_UNREACHABLE() here? I don't think we are expected to get into the cleanup function for the capability if it's not present, or if the owner of the device is not the hardware domain. > + return; > + > + ctrl = pci_conf_read32(pdev->sbdf, rebar_offset + PCI_REBAR_CTRL(0)); > + nbars = MASK_EXTR(ctrl, PCI_REBAR_CTRL_NBAR_MASK); > + /* > + * Remove all possible registered registers except header. > + * Header register will be removed in mask function. > + */ > + vpci_remove_registers(pdev->vpci, rebar_offset + PCI_REBAR_CAP(0), > + PCI_REBAR_CTRL(nbars - 1)); > +} > + > static int cf_check init_rebar(struct pci_dev *pdev) > { > uint32_t ctrl; > @@ -80,7 +100,7 @@ static int cf_check init_rebar(struct pci_dev *pdev) > { > printk(XENLOG_ERR "%pd %pp: too big BAR number %u in > REBAR_CTRL\n", > pdev->domain, &pdev->sbdf, index); > - continue; > + return -EINVAL; -E2BIG might be better here. In general I try to avoid using EINVAL, as it's a catch all that makes differentiating error later on harder. > } > > bar = &pdev->vpci->header.bars[index]; > @@ -88,7 +108,7 @@ static int cf_check init_rebar(struct pci_dev *pdev) > { > printk(XENLOG_ERR "%pd %pp: BAR%u is not in memory space\n", > pdev->domain, &pdev->sbdf, index); > - continue; > + return -EINVAL; Maybe -EDOM here? -ENXIO or EIO might also be appropriate. Overall looks good. Thanks, Roger.
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |