[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 1/7] xz: add fall-through comments to a switch statement





On 06/12/2021 16:24, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 06.12.2021 17:21, Julien Grall wrote:
On 06/12/2021 16:12, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 06.12.2021 17:06, Julien Grall wrote:
On 06/12/2021 15:06, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 06.12.2021 15:28, Julien Grall wrote:
I am not going to ack it but I am also not going to Nack it if another
maintainer agrees with your approach.

FTAOD I'll be giving it a week or so, but unless I get an outright NAK,
I'm now in a position to put this in with Luca's R-b.

   From the check-in policy section in MAINTAINERS:

4. There must be no "open" objections.

So I think this cannot be check-in given two maintainers disagree on the
approach. That said, as I wrote earlier my condition for not Nacking is
another maintainer agree with your approach.

Hmm, I did address both your and Ian's concerns in v2, admittedly by only
going as far as minimally necessary. I therefore wouldn't call this an
"open objection".

I believe my objection is still open. I still have have no way to verify
what you did is correct.

For instance, the tags in patch #2 are:

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191104185107.3b6330df@xxxxxxxxxxx
Reported-by: Yu Sun <yusun2@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Lasse Collin <lasse.collin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Daniel Walker <danielwa@xxxxxxxxx>
[Linux commit: 8e20ba2e53fc6198cbfbcc700e9f884157052a8d]

The tags in the Linux commit are:

Signed-off-by: Lasse Collin <lasse.collin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Reported-by: Yu Sun <yusun2@xxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Daniel Walker <danielwa@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "Yixia Si (yisi)" <yisi@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

* The first two matches the original e-mails
* I couldn't find the 3rd on the ML.
* The Cc could be ignored
* The signed-off-by are I guess what you call "mechanical"

Am I understanding right that now you're complaining about me
having retained one tag too many? So far all discussion was about
too few tags.
I am complaining on the fact that this is really difficult to figure out how you decided which tags to keep.

I will repeat what I said before, it should have been so much easier if you just copied/pasted the one from the Linux commit.

Cheers,

--
Julien Grall



 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.