[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 09/11] xen/arm: if 1:1 direct-map domain use native UART address and IRQ number for vPL011





On 23/09/2021 08:11, Penny Zheng wrote:
From: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>

We always use a fix address to map the vPL011 to domains. The address
could be a problem for domains that are directly mapped.

So, for domains that are directly mapped, reuse the address of the
physical UART on the platform to avoid potential clashes.

Do the same for the virtual IRQ number: instead of always using
GUEST_VPL011_SPI, try to reuse the physical SPI number if possible.

Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Penny Zheng <penny.zheng@xxxxxxx>
---
  xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c  | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
  xen/arch/arm/vpl011.c        | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
  xen/include/asm-arm/vpl011.h |  2 ++
  3 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c b/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c
index 120f1ae575..c92e510ae7 100644
--- a/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c
+++ b/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c
@@ -30,6 +30,7 @@
#include <xen/irq.h>
  #include <xen/grant_table.h>
+#include <xen/serial.h>
static unsigned int __initdata opt_dom0_max_vcpus;
  integer_param("dom0_max_vcpus", opt_dom0_max_vcpus);
@@ -1942,8 +1943,11 @@ static int __init make_vpl011_uart_node(struct 
kernel_info *kinfo)
      gic_interrupt_t intr;
      __be32 reg[GUEST_ROOT_ADDRESS_CELLS + GUEST_ROOT_SIZE_CELLS];
      __be32 *cells;
+    struct domain *d = kinfo->d;
+    char buf[27];
- res = fdt_begin_node(fdt, "sbsa-uart@"__stringify(GUEST_PL011_BASE));
+    snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), "sbsa-uart@%"PRIx64, d->arch.vpl011.base_addr);
+    res = fdt_begin_node(fdt, buf);
      if ( res )
          return res;
@@ -1953,14 +1957,14 @@ static int __init make_vpl011_uart_node(struct kernel_info *kinfo) cells = &reg[0];
      dt_child_set_range(&cells, GUEST_ROOT_ADDRESS_CELLS,
-                       GUEST_ROOT_SIZE_CELLS, GUEST_PL011_BASE,
+                       GUEST_ROOT_SIZE_CELLS, d->arch.vpl011.base_addr,
                         GUEST_PL011_SIZE);
res = fdt_property(fdt, "reg", reg, sizeof(reg));
      if ( res )
          return res;
- set_interrupt(intr, GUEST_VPL011_SPI, 0xf, DT_IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH);
+    set_interrupt(intr, d->arch.vpl011.virq, 0xf, DT_IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH);
res = fdt_property(fdt, "interrupts", intr, sizeof (intr));
      if ( res )
@@ -2670,6 +2674,13 @@ static int __init construct_domU(struct domain *d,
      else
          allocate_static_memory(d, &kinfo, node);
+ /*
+     * Initialization before creating its device
+     * tree node in prepare_dtb_domU.
+     */

I think it would be better to explain *why* this needs to be done before.

+    if ( kinfo.vpl011 )
+        rc = domain_vpl011_init(d, NULL);
+
      rc = prepare_dtb_domU(d, &kinfo);
      if ( rc < 0 )
          return rc;
@@ -2678,9 +2689,6 @@ static int __init construct_domU(struct domain *d,
      if ( rc < 0 )
          return rc;
- if ( kinfo.vpl011 )
-        rc = domain_vpl011_init(d, NULL);
-
      return rc;
  }
@@ -2723,15 +2731,27 @@ void __init create_domUs(void) if ( !dt_property_read_u32(node, "nr_spis", &d_cfg.arch.nr_spis) )
          {
+            unsigned int vpl011_virq = GUEST_VPL011_SPI;

Coding style: Add a newline here.

              d_cfg.arch.nr_spis = gic_number_lines() - 32;
+ /*
+             * The VPL011 virq is GUEST_VPL011_SPI, unless direct-map in
+             * set, in which case we'll try to match the hardware.
+             *
+             * Typically, d->arch.vpl011.virq has the vpl011 irq number
+             * but at this point of the boot sequence it is not
+             * initialized yet.
+             */
+            if ( direct_map && serial_irq(SERHND_DTUART) > 0 )
+                vpl011_virq = serial_irq(SERHND_DTUART);

I think we should not continue if the domain is direct-mapped *and* the IRQ is not found. Otherwise, this will may just result to potential breakage if GUEST_VPL011_SPI happens to be used for an HW device.

+
              /*
               * vpl011 uses one emulated SPI. If vpl011 is requested, make
               * sure that we allocate enough SPIs for it.
               */
              if ( dt_property_read_bool(node, "vpl011") )
                  d_cfg.arch.nr_spis = MAX(d_cfg.arch.nr_spis,
-                                         GUEST_VPL011_SPI - 32 + 1);
+                                         vpl011_virq - 32 + 1);
          }
/*
diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/vpl011.c b/xen/arch/arm/vpl011.c
index 895f436cc4..10df25f098 100644
--- a/xen/arch/arm/vpl011.c
+++ b/xen/arch/arm/vpl011.c
@@ -29,6 +29,7 @@
  #include <xen/mm.h>
  #include <xen/sched.h>
  #include <xen/console.h>
+#include <xen/serial.h>
  #include <public/domctl.h>
  #include <public/io/console.h>
  #include <asm/pl011-uart.h>
@@ -71,11 +72,11 @@ static void vpl011_update_interrupt_status(struct domain *d)
       * status bit has been set since the last time.
       */
      if ( uartmis & ~vpl011->shadow_uartmis )
-        vgic_inject_irq(d, NULL, GUEST_VPL011_SPI, true);
+        vgic_inject_irq(d, NULL, vpl011->virq, true);
vpl011->shadow_uartmis = uartmis;
  #else
-    vgic_inject_irq(d, NULL, GUEST_VPL011_SPI, uartmis);
+    vgic_inject_irq(d, NULL, vpl011->virq, uartmis);
  #endif
  }
@@ -347,7 +348,8 @@ static int vpl011_mmio_read(struct vcpu *v,
                              void *priv)
  {
      struct hsr_dabt dabt = info->dabt;
-    uint32_t vpl011_reg = (uint32_t)(info->gpa - GUEST_PL011_BASE);
+    uint32_t vpl011_reg = (uint32_t)(info->gpa -
+                                     v->domain->arch.vpl011.base_addr);
      struct vpl011 *vpl011 = &v->domain->arch.vpl011;
      struct domain *d = v->domain;
      unsigned long flags;
@@ -430,7 +432,8 @@ static int vpl011_mmio_write(struct vcpu *v,
                               void *priv)
  {
      struct hsr_dabt dabt = info->dabt;
-    uint32_t vpl011_reg = (uint32_t)(info->gpa - GUEST_PL011_BASE);
+    uint32_t vpl011_reg = (uint32_t)(info->gpa -
+                                     v->domain->arch.vpl011.base_addr);
      struct vpl011 *vpl011 = &v->domain->arch.vpl011;
      struct domain *d = v->domain;
      unsigned long flags;
@@ -622,10 +625,27 @@ int domain_vpl011_init(struct domain *d, struct 
vpl011_init_info *info)
  {
      int rc;
      struct vpl011 *vpl011 = &d->arch.vpl011;
+    const struct vuart_info *uart = serial_vuart_info(SERHND_DTUART);
if ( vpl011->backend.dom.ring_buf )
          return -EINVAL;
+ vpl011->base_addr = GUEST_PL011_BASE;
+    vpl011->virq = GUEST_VPL011_SPI;
+    if ( is_domain_direct_mapped(d) )
+    {
+        if ( uart != NULL && serial_irq(SERHND_DTUART) > 0 )
+        {
+            vpl011->base_addr = uart->base_addr;
+            vpl011->virq = serial_irq(SERHND_DTUART);

This seems a bit pointless to call serial_irq() twice. How about add a field in vuart_info to return the interrupt number?

+        }
+        else
+            printk(XENLOG_ERR
+                   "Unable to reuse physical UART address and irq for 
vPL011.\n"
+                   "Defaulting to addr %#"PRIpaddr" and IRQ %u\n",
+                   vpl011->base_addr, vpl011->virq);
+    }
+
      /*
       * info is NULL when the backend is in Xen.
       * info is != NULL when the backend is in a domain.
@@ -661,7 +681,7 @@ int domain_vpl011_init(struct domain *d, struct 
vpl011_init_info *info)
          }
      }
- rc = vgic_reserve_virq(d, GUEST_VPL011_SPI);
+    rc = vgic_reserve_virq(d, vpl011->virq);
      if ( !rc )
      {
          rc = -EINVAL;
@@ -673,12 +693,12 @@ int domain_vpl011_init(struct domain *d, struct 
vpl011_init_info *info)
      spin_lock_init(&vpl011->lock);
register_mmio_handler(d, &vpl011_mmio_handler,
-                          GUEST_PL011_BASE, GUEST_PL011_SIZE, NULL);
+                          vpl011->base_addr, GUEST_PL011_SIZE, NULL);

So you are making the assumpption that the UART region will be equal to (or bigger) than GUEST_PL011_SIZE. There are definitely UART out where the MMIO region is smaller than 4K.

Although, I don't expect them to be passthrough today. So this is probably fine to assume that the next 4K is free. Can you add some justification in-code and in the commit message?

return 0; out2:
-    vgic_free_virq(d, GUEST_VPL011_SPI);
+    vgic_free_virq(d, vpl011->virq);
out1:
      if ( vpl011->backend_in_domain )
diff --git a/xen/include/asm-arm/vpl011.h b/xen/include/asm-arm/vpl011.h
index e6c7ab7381..c09abcd7a9 100644
--- a/xen/include/asm-arm/vpl011.h
+++ b/xen/include/asm-arm/vpl011.h
@@ -53,6 +53,8 @@ struct vpl011 {
      uint32_t    uarticr;        /* Interrupt clear register */
      uint32_t    uartris;        /* Raw interrupt status register */
      uint32_t    shadow_uartmis; /* shadow masked interrupt register */
+    paddr_t     base_addr;
+    unsigned int virq;
      spinlock_t  lock;
      evtchn_port_t evtchn;
  };


Cheers,

--
Julien Grall



 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.