[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: pci passthrough issue introduced between 4.14.1 and 4.15.0

  • To: AL13N <alien@xxxxxxxx>
  • From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2021 08:56:03 +0200
  • Arc-authentication-results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=suse.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=suse.com; dkim=pass header.d=suse.com; arc=none
  • Arc-message-signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=KJiwepwRqxdph7NGCMGqmw1+pSn8NxwUwhAHY0K4Kvk=; b=SCepiTqjsgc2orihODpne3ccv/km54XTdETH6nmOJziUltwFGxjJC1xKSDMpKmA0EsPHkkCfEMgK7t+aj+Q1VOdaDGhdqrbCPN2/yQNvIQsryA8ZEO9ZlpCLd3G+jrdPaudS0cPT3U03Cvnj8x9FzVvywaYFweSuMnf94Kjo3tqPFYQxSNMsHyFLpWPAT89gejb9dw/dOgE9e2dc6I2J8ldHgz6Ug62jIn0pLiyieqqmbeneuTdIdqEr2yzmPV+1ZFwdVCAuVd57MlN3Yi8zFqif0m8TmwA/OHK1nmBV51OaQHX+ovmQ7TyesJK7tjYjyoCfx0fEir0If3Y5hVdLcg==
  • Arc-seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=ch+v61ow9aXkSKq+I3I1WClp6lEMjVFWZdGFI3X5LMeuYazGp5Npw9Lpca5sqKpJLG0gbyDkGQYluZd0GMUQkb/kEY4WAIe/h7V4b51IkWxeaC7hfYVkFOKEkY5DH264cXF6Ww9UExnanpvGvnXVU5NeOV1tL4vKoO8FIfxBX/ekrzuiddN4CZiM4io+SFtNoBcGZmdrA0VWGq3y/C54YiyKRTTNwubqP5NjOM/gFbcbD2fATvzrtHHYKe4AKnnmllKAH6S2SMoogO1n2SDl68AK/q5kktKM0lp5+y77sLuizgAm1kLTa9oYhZMT8TH/vFS/4OAmrifhcvD/jsSBEw==
  • Authentication-results: lists.xen.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;lists.xen.org; dmarc=none action=none header.from=suse.com;
  • Cc: Xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Delivery-date: Fri, 04 Jun 2021 06:56:17 +0000
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>

On 03.06.2021 18:01, AL13N wrote:
> Jan Beulich schreef op 2021-06-01 16:53:
>> On 01.06.2021 16:44, AL13N wrote:
>>> This mailing list is the correct place for the toolstack too? right?
>> Yes.
> So, what's the plan to fix this? is the plan to fix the toolstack? or 
> put your patch in kernel to kinda workaround it?

The patch has already been put in the kernel, as said. It would be good
to know whether it actually has helped your case as well.

> Is there a way to make a regression test or unit test or something?

Would be nice, but may be a little difficult to arrange for in, say,

> Does anyone have an idea on what patch would cause the regression?

Not me, but I'm also not a tool stack maintainer (nor expert in any


> that 
> patch that I pointed out, could it be that one, or should i look at a 
> specific file/line? I can't really just test all of the patches and/or 
> combinations. I'm not really at home with the xen code; and my single 
> xen server is production, so i can really only test in weekends...
> AL13N



Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.