Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] x86/PV: avoid speculation abuse through guest accessors

[Ian Jackson <iwj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Jan Beulich writes ("Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] x86/PV: avoid speculation abuse through 
guest accessors"):
> On 24.02.2021 14:08, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > For 7, I remember what I think was an IRC conversation where someone
> > (you, I think) said you had examined the generated asm and it was
> > unchanged.
> 
> It was in email, and I've inspected only some example of the
> generated asm, not all instances. I would hope that was
> sufficient, but since I'm not entirely certain ...
> 
> > If I have remembered that correctly, then for 7 as well:
> > Release-Acked-by: Ian Jackson <iwj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> ... I'll better wait for explicit confirmation of this.

I think that's convincing enough.  Thank you.

Release-Acked-by: Ian Jackson <iwj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>