[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] hw/xen: Have Xen machines select 9pfs
On 2/1/21 11:23 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 01/02/21 10:18, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: >> FYI using 'imply FSDEV_9P' instead I get: >> >> /usr/bin/ld: libcommon.fa.p/hw_xen_xen-legacy-backend.c.o: in function >> `xen_be_register_common': >> hw/xen/xen-legacy-backend.c:754: undefined reference to `xen_9pfs_ops' > > Ok, so then we have the case of a file (hw/xen/xen-legacy-backend.c) > brought in by CONFIG_XEN. In that case this patch is incorrect... > >> The function is: >> >> void xen_be_register_common(void) >> { >> xen_set_dynamic_sysbus(); >> >> xen_be_register("console", &xen_console_ops); >> xen_be_register("vkbd", &xen_kbdmouse_ops); >> #ifdef CONFIG_VIRTFS >> xen_be_register("9pfs", &xen_9pfs_ops); >> #endif >> #ifdef CONFIG_USB_LIBUSB >> xen_be_register("qusb", &xen_usb_ops); >> #endif >> } >> >> The object is compiled using: >> >> -- >8 -- >> -#ifdef CONFIG_VIRTFS >> +#ifdef CONFIG_FSDEV_9P >> xen_be_register("9pfs", &xen_9pfs_ops); >> #endif >> --- > > ... and this is the best fix, together with: > > - a "#include CONFIG_DEVICES" at the top (to get CONFIG_FSDEV_9P) > > - moving xen-legacy-backend.c from softmmu_ss to specific_ss (to get > CONFIG_DEVICES) > > - changing "select" to "imply" in accel/Kconfig (otherwise the patch has > no effect) OK. > > But really, doing nothing and just dropping this patch is perfectly fine. Yes, I'll respin what I have so far and continue when I find the time and motivation another week-end.
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |