[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH] x86/hvm: Improve error information in handle_pio()
On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 02:07:38PM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote: > domain_crash() should always have a message which emitted even in release > builds, so something more useful than this is presented. > > (XEN) domain_crash called from io.c:171 > (XEN) domain_crash called from io.c:171 > (XEN) domain_crash called from io.c:171 > ... > > Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > CC: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx> > CC: Wei Liu <wl@xxxxxxx> > CC: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx> > CC: Paul Durrant <paul.durrant@xxxxxxxxxx> > CC: Marek Marczykowski-Górecki <marmarek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Part of a bug reported by Marek. Something else is wonky in the IO emulation > state, and preventing us from yielding to the scheduler so the domain can > progress with being shut down. > --- > xen/arch/x86/hvm/io.c | 4 +++- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/io.c b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/io.c > index a5b0a23f06..4e468bfb6b 100644 > --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/io.c > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/io.c > @@ -167,7 +167,9 @@ bool handle_pio(uint16_t port, unsigned int size, int dir) > break; > > default: > - gdprintk(XENLOG_ERR, "Weird HVM ioemulation status %d.\n", rc); > + gprintk(XENLOG_ERR, "Unexpected PIO status %d, port %#x %s > 0x%0*lx\n", > + rc, port, dir == IOREQ_WRITE ? "write" : "read", > + size * 2, data & ((1ul << (size * 8)) - 1)); I wonder, should data be initialized to 0 in order to prevent writing garbage here if the buffer is not filled in the read case? Note sure it's better to print garbage or just 0 in that case, as in both cases it won't be possible to figure out if it's real data or just the emulation didn't get to fill it (unless the specific error path is checked). Thanks, Roger.
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |