Re: [PATCH] x86/shadow: Reposition sh_remove_write_access_from_sl1p()

[Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 10:04:28AM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> When compiling with SHOPT_OUT_OF_SYNC disabled, the build fails with:
> 
>   common.c:41:12: error: ‘sh_remove_write_access_from_sl1p’ declared ‘static’ 
> but never defined [-Werror=unused-function]
>    static int sh_remove_write_access_from_sl1p(struct domain *d, mfn_t gmfn,
>               ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 
> due to an unguarded forward declaration.
> 
> It turns out there is no need to forward declare
> sh_remove_write_access_from_sl1p() to begin with, so move it to just ahead of
> its first users, which is within a larger #ifdef'd SHOPT_OUT_OF_SYNC block.
> 
> Fix up for style while moving it.  No functional change.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>

> ---
> CC: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>
> CC: Wei Liu <wl@xxxxxxx>
> CC: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>
> CC: Tim Deegan <tim@xxxxxxx>
> ---
>  xen/arch/x86/mm/shadow/common.c | 56 
> ++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
>  1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/mm/shadow/common.c b/xen/arch/x86/mm/shadow/common.c
> index 0ac3f880e1..6dff240e97 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/mm/shadow/common.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/mm/shadow/common.c
> @@ -38,9 +38,6 @@
>  #include <xen/numa.h>
>  #include "private.h"
>  
> -static int sh_remove_write_access_from_sl1p(struct domain *d, mfn_t gmfn,
> -                                            mfn_t smfn, unsigned long 
> offset);
> -
>  DEFINE_PER_CPU(uint32_t,trace_shadow_path_flags);
>  
>  static int sh_enable_log_dirty(struct domain *, bool log_global);
> @@ -252,6 +249,31 @@ static inline void _sh_resync_l1(struct vcpu *v, mfn_t 
> gmfn, mfn_t snpmfn)
>          SHADOW_INTERNAL_NAME(sh_resync_l1, 4)(v, gmfn, snpmfn);
>  }
>  
> +static int sh_remove_write_access_from_sl1p(struct domain *d, mfn_t gmfn,
> +                                            mfn_t smfn, unsigned long off)
> +{
> +    struct page_info *sp = mfn_to_page(smfn);
> +
> +    ASSERT(mfn_valid(smfn));
> +    ASSERT(mfn_valid(gmfn));
> +
> +    if ( sp->u.sh.type == SH_type_l1_32_shadow ||
> +         sp->u.sh.type == SH_type_fl1_32_shadow )

Using a switch would also be nice IMO and would avoid some of the code
churn.

Thanks, Roger.