[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH 6/7] xen/guest_access: Consolidate guest access helpers in xen/guest_access.h
Hi. My attention was drawn to this thread. As I understand it, everyone is agreed that deduplicating the implementation is good (I also agree). The debate is only between: 1. Put it in xen/ until an arch comes along that needs something different, at which point maybe introduce an asm-generic-style thing with default implementations. 2. Say, now, that this is a default implementation and it should go in asm-generic. My starting point is that Julien, as the primary author of this cleanup, should be given leeway on a matter of taste like this. (There are as I understand it no wider implications.) Also, ISTM that it can be argued that introducing a new abstraction is an additional piece of work. Doing that is certainly not hampered by Julien's change. So that would be another reason to take Julien's patch as-is. On the merits, I don't have anything to add to the arguments already presented. I am considerably more persuaded by Julien's arguments than Jan's. So on all levels I think this commit should go in, unless there are other concerns that have not been discussed here ? Thanks, Ian.
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |