[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86/tss: Fix clang build following c/s 7888440625



On 13.08.2019 14:01, Andrew Cooper wrote:
Clang-3.5 from Debian Jessie fails with:

   smpboot.c:829:29: error: statement expression not allowed at file scope
           BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(this_cpu(tss_page)) != PAGE_SIZE);
                               ^
   /local/xen.git/xen/include/asm/percpu.h:14:7: note: expanded from macro
           'this_cpu'
       (*RELOC_HIDE(&per_cpu__##var, get_cpu_info()->per_cpu_offset))
         ^
   /local/xen.git/xen/include/xen/compiler.h:98:3: note: expanded from macro
           'RELOC_HIDE'
     ({ unsigned long __ptr;                       \
     ^
   /local/xen.git/xen/include/xen/lib.h:26:53: note: expanded from macro
           'BUILD_BUG_ON'
   #define BUILD_BUG_ON(cond) ((void)BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO(cond))
                                                       ^
   /local/xen.git/xen/include/xen/lib.h:25:57: note: expanded from macro
           'BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO'
   #define BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO(cond) sizeof(struct { int:-!!(cond); })
                                                           ^
   1 error generated.
   /local/xen.git/xen/Rules.mk:202: recipe for target 'smpboot.o' failed

This is obviously a compiler bug because the BUILD_BUG_ON() is not at file
scope.  However, it can be worked around by using a local variable.

It can be worked around, yes, but the result is not identical:

--- a/xen/arch/x86/smpboot.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/smpboot.c
@@ -826,9 +826,11 @@ static int setup_cpu_root_pgt(unsigned int cpu)
          rc = clone_mapping(idt_tables[cpu], rpt);
      if ( !rc )
      {
-        BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(this_cpu(tss_page)) != PAGE_SIZE);
+        struct tss_page *this_tss = &per_cpu(tss_page, cpu);

Whatever type is compatible with struct tss_page * will now be
permitted on the rhs. Hence ...

-        rc = clone_mapping(&per_cpu(tss_page, cpu).tss, rpt);
+        BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(*this_tss) != PAGE_SIZE);

... this sizeof() is not necessarily checking the size of the
per-CPU variable. But anyway - the change has been committed
already, and the chances of this going wrong are low enough, so
please don't treat this as an objection or revert request.

Jan

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel

 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.