[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 6/6] xen/arm: clarify the support status of iomem configurations


On 07/08/2019 10:08, Julien Grall wrote:

On 07/08/2019 01:23, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
iomem settings fall under the broader category of "Non-PCI device
passthrough": they are not security supported. Make it clearer.

Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefanos@xxxxxxxxxx>
CC: tim@xxxxxxx
CC: konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx
CC: Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxx>
CC: JBeulich@xxxxxxxx
CC: andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx
CC: ian.jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
CC: wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx

I just realized after sending the e-mail that the list of CC is smaller than it should and Wei's e-mail is incorrect. On the other e-mails, you forgot to CC Volodymyr as Arm reviewer.

I am pretty sure I already pointed that out in the past... We have tools in place to find out the maintainers to CC and add them (see scripts/add_maintainers.pl). So there are no need to do this manually anymore.

  SUPPORT.md | 2 +-
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/SUPPORT.md b/SUPPORT.md
index 375473a456..bc6fb58e04 100644
--- a/SUPPORT.md
+++ b/SUPPORT.md
@@ -639,7 +639,7 @@ to be used in addition to QEMU.
      Status: Experimental
-### ARM/Non-PCI device passthrough
+### ARM/Non-PCI device passthrough and other iomem configurations

I don't understand the new title. What are the other use case of IOMEM configurations?


      Status: Supported, not security supported

Julien Grall

Xen-devel mailing list



Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.