[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 6/6] xen/arm: clarify the support status of iomem configurations
Hi, On 07/08/2019 10:08, Julien Grall wrote: Hi, On 07/08/2019 01:23, Stefano Stabellini wrote:iomem settings fall under the broader category of "Non-PCI device passthrough": they are not security supported. Make it clearer. Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefanos@xxxxxxxxxx> CC: tim@xxxxxxx CC: konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx CC: Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxx> CC: JBeulich@xxxxxxxx CC: andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx CC: ian.jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx CC: wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx I just realized after sending the e-mail that the list of CC is smaller than it should and Wei's e-mail is incorrect. On the other e-mails, you forgot to CC Volodymyr as Arm reviewer. I am pretty sure I already pointed that out in the past... We have tools in place to find out the maintainers to CC and add them (see scripts/add_maintainers.pl). So there are no need to do this manually anymore. --- SUPPORT.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/SUPPORT.md b/SUPPORT.md index 375473a456..bc6fb58e04 100644 --- a/SUPPORT.md +++ b/SUPPORT.md @@ -639,7 +639,7 @@ to be used in addition to QEMU. Status: Experimental -### ARM/Non-PCI device passthrough +### ARM/Non-PCI device passthrough and other iomem configurationsI don't understand the new title. What are the other use case of IOMEM configurations?Cheers,Status: Supported, not security supported -- Julien Grall _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |