Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 6/6] xen/arm: clarify the support status of iomem configurations

[Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxx>]

Hi,

On 07/08/2019 01:23, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> iomem settings fall under the broader category of "Non-PCI device
> passthrough": they are not security supported. Make it clearer.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefanos@xxxxxxxxxx>
> CC: tim@xxxxxxx
> CC: konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx
> CC: Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxx>
> CC: JBeulich@xxxxxxxx
> CC: andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx
> CC: ian.jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> CC: wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx
> ---
>   SUPPORT.md | 2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/SUPPORT.md b/SUPPORT.md
> index 375473a456..bc6fb58e04 100644
> --- a/SUPPORT.md
> +++ b/SUPPORT.md
> @@ -639,7 +639,7 @@ to be used in addition to QEMU.
>   
>   	Status: Experimental
>   
> -### ARM/Non-PCI device passthrough
> +### ARM/Non-PCI device passthrough and other iomem configurations
I don't understand the new title. What are the other use case of IOMEM 
configurations?
Cheers,

>   
>       Status: Supported, not security supported
>   
--
Julien Grall

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel