Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 128240: regressions - FAIL

[Dario Faggioli <dfaggioli@xxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, 2018-10-02 at 09:29 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > > > On 01.10.18 at 18:07, <jgross@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 
> > We should ignore a mismatch of the scheduler. Failures when setting
> > parameters for a matching scheduler should not be ignored IMO.
> 
> Well, depends on whether the scheduler was explicitly chosen.
> I don't think migration should succeed when e.g. RTDS was used
> and isn't available on the destination host.
> 
I'm not sure I'm understanding.

You're saying, that, e.g., the migration of a VM between, for instance:

- a Xen 4.11 host, booted without any sched=, and hence running Credit,
  and another Xen 4.11 host, booted with sched=credit2,

should fail _while_ :

- a migration between a Xen 4.11 host, booted without any sched=, and 
  hence using Credit, and a Xen 4.12 host, booted without any sched=, 
  and hence using Credit2 (if we switch),

should succeed ?

Dario
-- 
<<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli
Software Engineer @ SUSE https://www.suse.com/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel