[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 128240: regressions - FAIL

>>> On 01.10.18 at 18:07, <jgross@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 01/10/2018 17:48, George Dunlap wrote:
>> On 10/01/2018 04:40 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>>> If there isn't an obvious fix, then the switch of default scheduler
>>> needs reverting until there is a fix present.  This is currently
>>> blocking master.
>> Agreed.  I'd argue for ignoring failures to set scheduler parameters on
>> migrate, on the grounds that this will be less risk to the project as a
>> whole than reverting credit2 again.  But either way we should do
>> something quickly.
> We should ignore a mismatch of the scheduler. Failures when setting
> parameters for a matching scheduler should not be ignored IMO.

Well, depends on whether the scheduler was explicitly chosen.
I don't think migration should succeed when e.g. RTDS was used
and isn't available on the destination host.


Xen-devel mailing list



Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.