Re: [Xen-devel] Rudolph: merging Vixen and Comet

[Anthony Liguori <anthony@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 5:51 PM, George Dunlap <dunlapg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 4:42 PM, Doug Goldstein <cardoe@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On 1/12/18 8:20 AM, Wei Liu wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 03:17:04PM +0100, Olaf Hering wrote:
>>>> On Fri, Jan 12, Wei Liu wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>                       Vixen                          Comet
>>>>> Guest console         Output only                    Bi-directional
>>>>
>>>> With the proper patch input works for Vixen. Unless this item mean
>>>> something else.
>>>
>>> Vixen means the version upstream put into the advisory. The patch you
>>> talked about is not provided in that branch.
>>>
>>> Wei.
>>>
>>
>> Can we merge some fixes people have proposed into the Vixen branch?
>> There are a number of virtualization providers that have rolled forward
>> with Vixen. They are clearly contributing patches on the ML and having
>> one place to work together would be nice.
>
> If Anthony is OK, we can call him the "maintainer" for the Vixen
> branch; the committers can check in anything that has his Ack to the
> Vixen branch, and the Security Team can post new signed tags when
> appropriate.
>
> It looked like Anthony had some issues with the most recent patch though.

I am very happy to review stuff for the Vixen branch but I'm even more
eager to get Vixen and Comet merged.  Getting Comet into staging will
help out us a lot.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

>  -George
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel