Re: [Xen-devel] Radical proposal: ship not-fully-tidied shim as 4.10.1

[Hans van Kranenburg <hans@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 01/10/2018 06:50 AM, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 09/01/18 23:11, Hans van Kranenburg wrote:
>> On 01/09/2018 07:22 PM, Rich Persaud wrote:
>>>
>>
>>> Since the primary audience for security fixes are production
>>> deployments of Xen where customer assets are at risk, is there an
>>> estimate for the percentage/size of Xen deployments where PVH (not
>>> only Xen 4.10) has already been deployed for production customers?
>>> That could give other customers more confidence in deploying PVH in
>>> production.
>> +1
>>
>> I have been hearing mostly-very-positive stories around, except for the
>> missing pvgrub2 support. :)
> 
> https://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2017-11/msg01795.html

Ah thanks. I also found the links to kernel changes and a xen change.

http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/grub-devel/2017-12/msg00002.html

I'm going to play around with it, see if I can get it running. Being
able to use pvgrub2 will mean ending up with an incredibly smooth
migration path to Xen 4.10 and PVHv2...

Hans


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel