Re: [Xen-devel] Commit moratorium to staging [and 1 more messages]

[Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Ian,

On 02/11/17 13:27, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Julien Grall writes ("Re: Commit moratorium to staging"):
> > Thank you for the explanation. I agree with the force push to unblock
> > master (and other tree I mentioned).
> I will force push all the affected trees, but in a reactive way
> because I base each force push on a test report - so it won't be right
> away for all of them.
>
> osstest service owner writes ("[xen-unstable test] 115471: regressions - FAIL"):
> > flight 115471 xen-unstable real [real]
> > http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/115471/
> >
> > Regressions :-(
> >
> > Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
> > including tests which could not be run:
> >   test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-ws16-amd64 17 guest-stop        fail REGR. vs. 114644
> >   test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-ws16-amd64 17 guest-stop       fail REGR. vs. 114644
> >   test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-ws16-amd64 17 guest-stop       fail REGR. vs. 114644
> The above are justifiable as discussed, leaving no blockers.
>
> > version targeted for testing:
> >   xen                  bb2c1a1cc98a22e2d4c14b18421aa7be6c2adf0d
> So I have forced pushed that.
Thank you! With that, the tree is re-opened. I will go through my 
backlog of Xen 4.10 and have a look whether they are suitable.
Cheers,


--
Julien Grall

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel