|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2] x86: correct create_bounce_frame
Commit d9b7ef209a7 ("x86: drop failsafe callback invocation from
assembly") didn't go quite far enough with the cleanup it did: The
changed maximum frame size should also have been reflected in the early
address range check (which has now been pointed out to have been wrong
anyway, using 60 instead of 0x60), and it should have updated the
comment ahead of the function.
Also adjust the lower bound - all is fine (for our purposes) if the
initial guest kernel stack pointer points right at the hypervisor base
address, as only memory _below_ that address is going to be written.
Additionally limit the number of times %rsi is being adjusted to what
is really needed.
Finally move exception fixup code into the designated .fixup section.
Reported-by: Jann Horn <jannh@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
---
This corrects the code which did result in XSA-215 on Xen 4.6 and
older. For that reason I at least want to explore whether this is a
change we want to take for 4.9.
---
v2: Change domain_crash_page_fault_* tags and add comment ahead of the
labels. Convert 8(%rsi) to 1*8(%rsi) and (%rsi) to 0*8(%rsi).
--- a/xen/arch/x86/x86_64/entry.S
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/x86_64/entry.S
@@ -258,7 +258,7 @@ int80_slow_path:
jmp handle_exception_saved
/* CREATE A BASIC EXCEPTION FRAME ON GUEST OS STACK: */
-/* { RCX, R11, [DS-GS,] [CR2,] [ERRCODE,] RIP, CS, RFLAGS, RSP, SS } */
+/* { RCX, R11, [ERRCODE,] RIP, CS, RFLAGS, RSP, SS } */
/* %rdx: trap_bounce, %rbx: struct vcpu */
/* On return only %rbx and %rdx are guaranteed non-clobbered. */
create_bounce_frame:
@@ -276,9 +276,9 @@ create_bounce_frame:
movq UREGS_rsp+8(%rsp),%rsi
andb $0xfc,UREGS_cs+8(%rsp) # Indicate kernel context to guest.
2: andq $~0xf,%rsi # Stack frames are 16-byte aligned.
- movq $HYPERVISOR_VIRT_START,%rax
+ movq $HYPERVISOR_VIRT_START+1,%rax
cmpq %rax,%rsi
- movq $HYPERVISOR_VIRT_END+60,%rax
+ movq $HYPERVISOR_VIRT_END+8*8,%rax
sbb %ecx,%ecx # In +ve address space? Then okay.
cmpq %rax,%rsi
adc %ecx,%ecx # Above Xen private area? Then okay.
@@ -286,13 +286,13 @@ UNLIKELY_START(g, create_bounce_frame_ba
lea UNLIKELY_DISPATCH_LABEL(create_bounce_frame_bad_sp)(%rip), %rdi
jmp asm_domain_crash_synchronous /* Does not return */
__UNLIKELY_END(create_bounce_frame_bad_sp)
- subq $40,%rsi
+ subq $7*8,%rsi
movq UREGS_ss+8(%rsp),%rax
ASM_STAC
movq VCPU_domain(%rbx),%rdi
-.Lft2: movq %rax,32(%rsi) # SS
+.Lft2: movq %rax,6*8(%rsi) # SS
movq UREGS_rsp+8(%rsp),%rax
-.Lft3: movq %rax,24(%rsi) # RSP
+.Lft3: movq %rax,5*8(%rsi) # RSP
movq VCPU_vcpu_info(%rbx),%rax
pushq VCPUINFO_upcall_mask(%rax)
testb $TBF_INTERRUPT,TRAPBOUNCE_flags(%rdx)
@@ -301,7 +301,7 @@ __UNLIKELY_END(create_bounce_frame_bad_s
popq %rax
shlq $32,%rax # Bits 32-39: saved_upcall_mask
movw UREGS_cs+8(%rsp),%ax # Bits 0-15: CS
-.Lft4: movq %rax,8(%rsi) # CS / saved_upcall_mask
+.Lft4: movq %rax,3*8(%rsi) # CS / saved_upcall_mask
shrq $32,%rax
testb $0xFF,%al # Bits 0-7: saved_upcall_mask
setz %ch # %ch == !saved_upcall_mask
@@ -313,20 +313,19 @@ __UNLIKELY_END(create_bounce_frame_bad_s
testb $1 << VMASST_TYPE_architectural_iopl,DOMAIN_vm_assist(%rdi)
cmovnzl VCPU_iopl(%rbx),%ecx # Bits 13:12 (EFLAGS.IOPL)
orl %ecx,%eax # Fold EFLAGS.IOPL into %eax
-.Lft5: movq %rax,16(%rsi) # RFLAGS
+.Lft5: movq %rax,4*8(%rsi) # RFLAGS
movq UREGS_rip+8(%rsp),%rax
-.Lft6: movq %rax,(%rsi) # RIP
+.Lft6: movq %rax,2*8(%rsi) # RIP
testb $TBF_EXCEPTION_ERRCODE,TRAPBOUNCE_flags(%rdx)
jz 1f
subq $8,%rsi
movl TRAPBOUNCE_error_code(%rdx),%eax
-.Lft7: movq %rax,(%rsi) # ERROR CODE
+.Lft7: movq %rax,2*8(%rsi) # ERROR CODE
1:
- subq $16,%rsi
movq UREGS_r11+8(%rsp),%rax
-.Lft12: movq %rax,8(%rsi) # R11
+.Lft12: movq %rax,1*8(%rsi) # R11
movq UREGS_rcx+8(%rsp),%rax
-.Lft13: movq %rax,(%rsi) # RCX
+.Lft13: movq %rax,0*8(%rsi) # RCX
ASM_CLAC
/* Rewrite our stack frame and return to guest-OS mode. */
/* IA32 Ref. Vol. 3: TF, VM, RF and NT flags are cleared on trap. */
@@ -345,24 +344,30 @@ UNLIKELY_START(z, create_bounce_frame_ba
__UNLIKELY_END(create_bounce_frame_bad_bounce_ip)
movq %rax,UREGS_rip+8(%rsp)
ret
- _ASM_EXTABLE(.Lft2, domain_crash_page_fault_32)
- _ASM_EXTABLE(.Lft3, domain_crash_page_fault_24)
- _ASM_EXTABLE(.Lft4, domain_crash_page_fault_8)
- _ASM_EXTABLE(.Lft5, domain_crash_page_fault_16)
- _ASM_EXTABLE(.Lft6, domain_crash_page_fault)
- _ASM_EXTABLE(.Lft7, domain_crash_page_fault)
- _ASM_EXTABLE(.Lft12, domain_crash_page_fault_8)
- _ASM_EXTABLE(.Lft13, domain_crash_page_fault)
+ _ASM_EXTABLE(.Lft2, domain_crash_page_fault_6x8)
+ _ASM_EXTABLE(.Lft3, domain_crash_page_fault_5x8)
+ _ASM_EXTABLE(.Lft4, domain_crash_page_fault_4x8)
+ _ASM_EXTABLE(.Lft5, domain_crash_page_fault_3x8)
+ _ASM_EXTABLE(.Lft6, domain_crash_page_fault_2x8)
+ _ASM_EXTABLE(.Lft7, domain_crash_page_fault_2x8)
+ _ASM_EXTABLE(.Lft12, domain_crash_page_fault_1x8)
+ _ASM_EXTABLE(.Lft13, domain_crash_page_fault_0x8)
-domain_crash_page_fault_32:
+ .pushsection .fixup, "ax", @progbits
+ # Numeric tags below represent the intended overall %rsi adjustment.
+domain_crash_page_fault_6x8:
addq $8,%rsi
-domain_crash_page_fault_24:
+domain_crash_page_fault_5x8:
addq $8,%rsi
-domain_crash_page_fault_16:
+domain_crash_page_fault_4x8:
addq $8,%rsi
-domain_crash_page_fault_8:
+domain_crash_page_fault_3x8:
addq $8,%rsi
-domain_crash_page_fault:
+domain_crash_page_fault_2x8:
+ addq $8,%rsi
+domain_crash_page_fault_1x8:
+ addq $8,%rsi
+domain_crash_page_fault_0x8:
ASM_CLAC
movq %rsi,%rdi
call show_page_walk
@@ -380,6 +385,7 @@ ENTRY(dom_crash_sync_extable)
orb %al,UREGS_cs(%rsp)
xorl %edi,%edi
jmp asm_domain_crash_synchronous /* Does not return */
+ .popsection
ENTRY(common_interrupt)
SAVE_ALL CLAC
Attachment:
x86-bounce-frame-size.patch _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
 |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |