[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen ARM small task (WAS: Re: [Xen Question])



Thank you for your attention.

From upper emails, https://bugs.xenproject.org/xen/ this is the small TODO list, which i follow up right?



2016-11-12 1:59 GMT+09:00 Edgar E. Iglesias <edgar.iglesias@xxxxxxxxx>:
On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 09:46:56AM +0000, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi Stefano,
>
> On 11/11/2016 02:24, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> >On Thu, 10 Nov 2016, Julien Grall wrote:
> >>(CC Stefano and change the title)
> >>
> >>Hello,
> >>
> >>On 10/11/16 12:13, casionwoo wrote:
> >>>I’m pleased about your reply and you have a lot of code to clean-up.
> >>>
> >>>As you mentioned, It’s really huge to digest at once. Thank you for
> >>>understanding me.
> >>>
> >>>And that’s why i need a small fix up and todo list.
> >>>
> >>>I feel familiar with ARM and c language and there’s no specific area yet.
> >>>
> >>>I think that i can find interesting area with following up the codes.
> >>>
> >>>I’m looking forward to being stuck on Xen.
> >>>
> >>>Then it would be easier for me to understand about Xen on ARM.
> >>>
> >>>Please let me know the TODO and bug-fix lists.
> >>
> >>Stefano, before giving a list of code clean-up, do you have any small TODO on
> >>ARM in mind?
> >
> >A simple task we talked about recently is to enable the vuart
> >(xen/arch/arm/vuart.c) for all guests. At the moment it is only emulated
> >for Dom0, but some guests, in particular BareMetal guests
> >(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BareMetal), would benefit from it.
> >
> >It would be best to introduce an option in libxl to explicitly
> >enable/disable the vuart for DomUs. Something like vuart=1 in the VM
> >config file.
>
> The vuart has not been enabled for DomU because it the UART region may clash
> with the guest memory layout (which is static).
>
> I don't think this option should be available until we allow the guest to
> use the same memory layout as the host (see e820_host parameter for x86).

Yes, we were thinking to give the mem layout one a try in 4.9 hopefully.

Another task that is not too huge is the one to allow Xen to map in
arbitrary memory regions as Normal Memory into domUs.
We discussed the possibility of having additional arch specific arguments
to the iomem settings.

This is for example useful to give DomU guests direct access to on chip
memories or to specific ranges of DRAM that may be needed to communicate
with devices.


>
> >
> >BTW we should keep this up to date:
> >
> >https://wiki.xenproject.org/wiki/Xen_ARM_TODO
>
> You are right, although it might be better to use the bug tracker [1] to
> stay aligned with the rest of the hypervisor.
>
> Note that I have got a list of TODO/bugs I track myself but never updated
> the wiki.

Good idea, I'll add some stuff into that list!

Best regards,
Edgar



>
> Cheers,
>
> [1] https://bugs.xenproject.org/xen/
>
> --
> Julien Grall
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel



--
JeungWoo, Yoo
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.