[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 4/6] x86/xstate: Fix latent bugs in expand_xsave_states()
>>> On 12.09.16 at 14:29, <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 12/09/16 12:41, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>>> On 12.09.16 at 11:51, <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> @@ -205,11 +222,9 @@ void expand_xsave_states(struct vcpu *v, void *dest, >>> unsigned int size) >>> >>> if ( src ) >>> { >>> - ASSERT((xstate_offsets[index] + xstate_sizes[index]) <= size); >>> + BUG_ON((xstate_offsets[index] + xstate_sizes[index]) <= size); >> Surely converting an ASSERT() to BUG_ON() means inverting the >> relational operator used? > > Very true. It is unfortunate that all of this is dead code, and > impossible to test. I also had half a mind to explicitly #if 0 it out > to leave people in no illusion that it ever might have been tested. So with this correct, the patch is then Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx> _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |