[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/9] x86/hypercall: Move some of the hvm hypercall infrastructure into hypercall.h
On Tue, 2 Aug 2016, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 02.08.16 at 16:59, <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 02/08/16 15:54, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>>>> On 02.08.16 at 16:26, <julien.grall@xxxxxxx> wrote: > >>> On 02/08/16 15:17, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>>> Well, I find it quite odd for hypercall argument counts to differ > >>>> between arches. I.e. I'd conclude the ABI was mis-specified. > >>> Is it documented somewhere for the x86 code? Looking at Linux, the > >>> privcmd call is only passing 5 arguments on both ARM and x86. > >> arch-x86/xen-x86_32.h has > >> > >> * Hypercall interface: > >> * Input: %ebx, %ecx, %edx, %esi, %edi, %ebp (arguments 1-6) > >> * Output: %eax > >> > >> while arch-x86/xen-x86_64.h has > >> > >> * Hypercall interface: > >> * Input: %rdi, %rsi, %rdx, %r10, %r8, %r9 (arguments 1-6) > >> * Output: %rax > > > > The only actual 6 argument hypercall is the v4v hypercall, better known > > as __HYPERVISOR_xc_reserved_op at index 39, but that isn't implemented > > anywhere upstream. > > But it serves as an example what now wouldn't work on ARM. At the time the arm hypercall ABI was published, it matched the x86 hypercall ABI, which had only 5 hypercall arguments. The issue is that the x86 hypercall ABI changed, and now is out of sync with ARM. The faulty commit being: commit 4af64160c580b02f28c992c09d55957cb20a9b91 Author: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed May 30 09:25:11 2012 +0100 x86: document register for 6th hypercall argument From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@xxxxxxxxxx> Committed-by: Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx> While the ARM ABI is from few months earlier: commit 40f20c4bfcd5d25c90f9419250ca8a229bf4c1e5 Author: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue Mar 13 16:04:05 2012 +0000 arm: use r12 to pass the hypercall number ** This is a guest visible ABI change which requires an updated guest kernel ** Use r12 to pass the hypercall number and r0-r4 for the hypercall arguments. Use the ISS to pass an hypervisor specific tag. Remove passing unused registers to arm_hypercall_table: we don't have 6 arguments hypercalls and we never use 64 bit values as hypercall arguments, 64 bit values are only contained within structs passed as arguments. Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> [ use #ifndef NDEBUG, fix coding style, expand calling convention comment slightly and added a big fat note about ABI change - ijc ] _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |