[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 16/17] libxc/xc_dom_arm: Copy ACPI tables to guest space



On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 11:47:04AM +0800, Shannon Zhao wrote:
> 
> 
> On 2016/7/6 18:12, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > On Wed, 6 Jul 2016, Julien Grall wrote:
> >> > Hi Stefano,
> >> > 
> >> > On 05/07/16 18:13, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> >>> > > On Thu, 23 Jun 2016, Julien Grall wrote:
> >>>> > > > On 23/06/2016 04:17, Shannon Zhao wrote:
> >>>>> > > > > From: Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhao@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>>> > > > > 
> >>>>> > > > > Copy all the ACPI tables to guest space so that UEFI or guest 
> >>>>> > > > > could
> >>>>> > > > > access them.
> >>>>> > > > > 
> >>>>> > > > > Signed-off-by: Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhao@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>>> > > > > ---
> >>>>> > > > >   tools/libxc/xc_dom_arm.c | 51
> >>>>> > > > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>>>> > > > >   1 file changed, 51 insertions(+)
> >>>>> > > > > 
> >>>>> > > > > diff --git a/tools/libxc/xc_dom_arm.c b/tools/libxc/xc_dom_arm.c
> >>>>> > > > > index 64a8b67..6a0a5b7 100644
> >>>>> > > > > --- a/tools/libxc/xc_dom_arm.c
> >>>>> > > > > +++ b/tools/libxc/xc_dom_arm.c
> >>>>> > > > > @@ -63,6 +63,47 @@ static int setup_pgtables_arm(struct 
> >>>>> > > > > xc_dom_image
> >>>>> > > > > *dom)
> >>>>> > > > > 
> >>>>> > > > >   /*
> >>>>> > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>> > > > > */
> >>>>> > > > > 
> >>>>> > > > > +static int xc_dom_copy_acpi(struct xc_dom_image *dom)
> >>>>> > > > > +{
> >>>>> > > > > +    int rc, i;
> >>>>> > > > > +    uint32_t pages_num = ROUNDUP(dom->acpitable_size, 
> >>>>> > > > > XC_PAGE_SHIFT) >>
> >>>>> > > > > +                         XC_PAGE_SHIFT;
> >>>>> > > > > +    const xen_pfn_t base = GUEST_ACPI_BASE >> XC_PAGE_SHIFT;
> >>>>> > > > > +    xen_pfn_t *p2m;
> >>>>> > > > > +    void *acpi_pages;
> >>>>> > > > > +
> >>>>> > > > > +    p2m = malloc(pages_num * sizeof(*p2m));
> >>>>> > > > > +    for (i = 0; i < pages_num; i++)
> >>>>> > > > > +        p2m[i] = base + i;
> >>>>> > > > > +
> >>>>> > > > > +    rc = xc_domain_populate_physmap_exact(dom->xch, 
> >>>>> > > > > dom->guest_domid,
> >>>>> > > > > +                                          pages_num, 0, 0, 
> >>>>> > > > > p2m);
> >>>> > > > 
> >>>> > > > Hmmmm... it looks like this is working because libxl is setting the
> >>>> > > > maximum
> >>>> > > > size of the domain with some slack (1MB). However, I guess the 
> >>>> > > > slack was
> >>>> > > > for
> >>>> > > > something else. Wei, Stefano, Ian, can you confirm?
> >>> > > 
> >>> > > If I recall correctly, the slack is a magic value coming from the
> >>> > > ancient history of toolstacks.
> >> > 
> >> > Does it mean we would need to update the slack to take into account the 
> >> > ACPI
> >> > blob?
> > Yes, we need to take into account the ACPI blob. Probably not in the
> > slack but directly in mam_memkb.
> Sorry, I'm not sure understand this. I found the b_info->max_memkb but
> didn't find the slack you said. And how to fix this? Update
> b_info->max_memkb or the slack?

Can you calculate the size of your payload and add that to max_memkb?

Don't bump the slack.

Wei.

> 
> Thanks,
> -- 
> Shannon
> 

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.