[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 03/17] libxl/arm: Add a configuration option for ARM DomU ACPI
On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 10:22:39AM +0100, Julien Grall wrote: [...] > >>Yeah, we can deprecate that field. But we need to take care to not break > >>users of the old field. > >Ok, what name would you suggest? > > I would suggest b_info->u.acpi > b_info->acpi would be more appropriate. diff --git a/tools/libxl/libxl_types.idl b/tools/libxl/libxl_types.idl index ef614be..a57823d 100644 --- a/tools/libxl/libxl_types.idl +++ b/tools/libxl/libxl_types.idl @@ -494,11 +494,16 @@ libxl_domain_build_info = Struct("domain_build_info",[ # Note that the partial device tree should avoid to use the phandle # 65000 which is reserved by the toolstack. ("device_tree", string), + ("acpi", libxl_defbool), ("u", KeyedUnion(None, libxl_domain_type, "type", [("hvm", Struct(None, [("firmware", string), ("bios", libxl_bios_type), ("pae", libxl_defbool), ("apic", libxl_defbool), + # The following acpi field is + # deprecated. Please use the unified + # acpi field above which works for both + # x86 and ARM. ("acpi", libxl_defbool), ("acpi_s3", libxl_defbool), ("acpi_s4", libxl_defbool), And then: 1. modify xl to set the new field. 2. modify libxl to handle compatibility: user of the old field should continue to work. I know this is a bit terse. Feel free to ask questions if you have any doubt. Wei. > Regards, > > -- > Julien Grall _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |