Re: [Xen-devel] Fixing libvirt's libxl driver breakage -- where to define LIBXL_API_VERSION?

[Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, 2016-04-14 at 18:59 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Dario Faggioli writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] Fixing libvirt's libxl driver
> breakage -- where to define LIBXL_API_VERSION?"):
> > 
> > And, in those cases, usage should be gated by the appropriate
> > LIBXL_HAVE_FOOBAR symbol, which I see in the sources (e.g.,
> > for LIBXL_HAVE_NO_SUSPEND_RESUME or LIBXL_HAVE_DOMAIN_NODEAFFINITY)
> > to
> > be the case, so good again. :-)
> If libvirt specifies LIBXL_API_VERSION then it does not need to check
> any LIBXL_HAVE_*, since it will actually get an API corresponding to
> the specified API_VERSION.
> 
I concur. And in fact, this patch introduces an LIBXL_API_VERSION and
drops the use of LIBXL_HAVE_*.

And I think the patch is right. :-)

Regards,
Dario
-- 
<<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli
Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel