Re: [Xen-devel] Fixing libvirt's libxl driver breakage -- where to define LIBXL_API_VERSION?

[Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Dario Faggioli writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] Fixing libvirt's libxl driver breakage 
-- where to define LIBXL_API_VERSION?"):
> And, in those cases, usage should be gated by the appropriate
> LIBXL_HAVE_FOOBAR symbol, which I see in the sources (e.g.,
> for LIBXL_HAVE_NO_SUSPEND_RESUME or LIBXL_HAVE_DOMAIN_NODEAFFINITY) to
> be the case, so good again. :-)

If libvirt specifies LIBXL_API_VERSION then it does not need to check
any LIBXL_HAVE_*, since it will actually get an API corresponding to
the specified API_VERSION.

Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel