Re: [Xen-devel] Clarifying PVH mode requirements

[PGNet Dev <pgnet.dev@xxxxxxxxx>]

> > On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 11:58 AM, Boris Ostrovsky
> >     Current PVH implementation has never been described as
> >     production-ready. What is happening now with HVMlite is
> >     essentially bringing PVH to production-quality level.
> >
> >
> > So should I s/PVH/HVMlite/g?
>  From user perspective that will be almost true. I am not sure it should
> be classified as PV mode anymore since it's really an HVM guest without
> any devices. But it's not there yet so it's too early to point your
> editor there.
>
> BTW, I don't think the flowchart in the wiki is correct as far as PVH is
> concerned --- you can't use PVH unless HVM (and, in fact, PVHVM) is
> supported.
Noting the very recent flurry of HVMLite activity, so where does PVH sit?

As it's not production-ready (and, atm, unusable here), is it planned to 
be?  Or is it being simply leap-frogged by HVMLite?

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel