[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] Clarifying PVH mode requirements

To: boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx, roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: PGNet Dev <pgnet.dev@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2016 07:49:14 -0800
Delivery-date: Mon, 01 Feb 2016 15:49:30 +0000
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xen.org>

On 02/01/2016 06:11 AM, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:

This actually never happened for Linux: HVMlite showed up fast enough
that it didn't make sense anymore to add 32-bit support to Linux
(especially given that AMD was still not supported).


Is 'HVMLite' replacing 'PVH'? Or are they separate modes?

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Xen-devel] Clarifying PVH mode requirements
  - From: Boris Ostrovsky

References:
- Re: [Xen-devel] Clarifying PVH mode requirements
  - From: Roger Pau MonnÃ
- Re: [Xen-devel] Clarifying PVH mode requirements
  - From: Boris Ostrovsky

Prev by Date: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 10/11] xen/hvmlite: Boot secondary CPUs
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCHv6 2/2] x86/ept: defer the invalidation until the p2m lock is released
Previous by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] Clarifying PVH mode requirements
Next by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] Clarifying PVH mode requirements
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.