Re: [Xen-devel] [v10][PATCH 11/16] tools/libxl: detect and avoid conflicts with RDM

[Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Ian Jackson writes ("Re: [v10][PATCH 11/16] tools/libxl: detect and avoid 
conflicts with RDM"):
> Chen, Tiejun writes ("Re: [v10][PATCH 11/16] tools/libxl: detect and avoid 
> conflicts with RDM"):
> > Sorry, I just ignore the line in brackets since I always think this kind 
> > of thing is often not a big deal, and next time I should pay more 
> > attention to the (). But indeed, before I post this whole patch online I 
> > also picked up this chunk of code to ask you to take a look that. This 
> > manner means I'm not very sure if I'm addressing this properly. But I 
> > didn't get a further response, so I guess that should work for you and 
> > then I posted the whole online.
> 
> You are talking about <55AE2BB1.9030604@xxxxxxxxx> I guess.  I replied
> to that with several comments about your prose and about the
> computation of the new set of rdms.
> 
> It's true that I didn't comment on the frat that you had half-done one
                                         fact
> of the things I had requested.  It is of course a waste of my time to
> be constantly re-reviewing half-done changes.

Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel