Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 57852: regressions - FAIL

["Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>]

>>> On 05.06.15 at 11:07, <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> From:
> http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/results/history.test-amd64-amd64 
> -xl-qemuu-win7-amd64.xen-4.4-testing.html
> http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/results/history.test-amd64-amd64 
> -xl-qemuu-win7-amd64.xen-4.5-testing.html
> it looks like none of the stable branches suffer from the install issue.
> I'd be inclined to discount any possible link with the migration issue
> based on that.

Generally I would agree, but it strikes me as extremely odd that
(a) stable trees face only the migration issue, while unstable only
faces the install one,
(b) a tree as old as 4.3 (receiving only security updates) developed
this migration issue (I went into more detail on this in a reply to flight
57474's report).

> WRT the move to the colo, flights in 5xxxx are in the new one, while
> 3xxxx are in the old one,
> http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/results/history.test-amd64-amd64 
> -xl-qemuu-win7-amd64.xen-unstable.html
> shows that things seemed ok for 8 consecutive runs after the move
> (ignoring blockages).

And when it went live, all systems being in use now got immediately
deployed?

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel