Re: [Xen-devel] freemem-slack and large memory environments

["Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>]

>>> On 26.02.15 at 18:53, <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Or maybe we just need to change the libxl_set_memory_target call to use
> an absolute memory target to avoid restricting dom0 memory more than
> necessary at each iteration. Also increasing the timeout argument passed
> to the libxl_wait_for_free_memory call could help.

Wouldn't that lead to problems with multiple racing invocations of
that function (perhaps from different processes)? (Note that I ask
this without knowledge on whether libxl already suitably serializes
things.)

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel