Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 3/3] xen/arm: Introduce support for Renesas R-Car Gen2 platform

[Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On 30/01/15 16:44, Oleksandr Tyshchenko wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 5:52 PM, Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Hi Oleksandr,
> Hi Julien
> 
>>
>> On 30/01/15 15:38, Oleksandr Tyshchenko wrote:
>>> For example, such a simple thing as a formula for calculating divider
>>> value for uart baudrate can differs from one family to
>>> another despite the fact that these families use the same UART IP
>>> block named SCIF (clock may be differs - ext/int, another freq).
>>> Or FIFO size, etc.
>>
>> IHMO this look more configuration than logic change in the UART driver.
>> We don't ask you to support all the configuration of the UART right now
>> ;). However, if someone comes with a new platform using the SCIF, I
>> expect him to reuse and fix this driver rather than creating a new one.
>>
>> FWIW, the compatible string is "renesas,scif" not rcar smth. So, SCIF
>> sounds a better name for this UART.
> ok
> 
> Just to clarify:
> - Should I remove all references to "R-Car Gen2" from UART stuff?

Yes please.

> - Can I keep your "Reviewed-by" after there mechanical changes.

Sure.

> It would be nice to hear your and Ian's opinions about board file.

I'm not sure about this one. I will let Ian decides.

Regards,

-- 
Julien Grall

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel