[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 12/14] xen-blkback: safely unmap grants in case they are still in use
On 23/01/15 15:47, Roger Pau Monné wrote: > El 23/01/15 a les 15.54, David Vrabel ha escrit: >> On 23/01/15 14:31, Roger Pau Monné wrote: >>> El 19/01/15 a les 16.51, David Vrabel ha escrit: >>>> + if (invcount) { >>>> + ret = gnttab_unmap_refs(unmap, NULL, unmap_pages, >>>> invcount); >>>> BUG_ON(ret); >>>> - put_free_pages(blkif, unmap_pages, invcount); >>>> - invcount = 0; >>>> + xen_blkbk_unmap_done(blkif, unmap_pages, invcount); >>>> } >>>> - } >>>> - if (invcount) { >>>> - ret = gnttab_unmap_refs(unmap, NULL, unmap_pages, invcount); >>>> - BUG_ON(ret); >>>> - put_free_pages(blkif, unmap_pages, invcount); >>>> + pages += batch; >>>> + num -= batch; > > This should be fixed to at least be (which is still not fully correct, > but it's better): > > pages += invcount; > num -= invcount; > > I hope an example will clarify this, suppose we have the following pages > array: > > pages[0] = persistent grant > pages[1] = persistent grant > pages[2] = regular grant > pages[3] = persistent grant > pages[4] = regular grant > > And batch is 1. In this case, the unmapped grant will be pages[2], but > then due to the code below pages will be updated to point to &pages[1], > which has already been scanned. If this was done correctly pages should > point to &pages[3]. As said, it's not really a bug, but the loop is > sub-optimal. Ah ha. Thanks for the clear explanation. gnttab_blkback_unmap_prepare() stops once its been through the whole batch regardless of whether it filled the array with ops so we don't check a page twice but this does mean we have a sub-optimal number of ops. David _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |