[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-devel] (v2) Design proposal for RMRR fix
- To: "Kevin Tian" <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>
- From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 08:43:19 +0000
- Cc: "wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx" <wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx>, "ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx" <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>, "stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, George Dunlap <george.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Tim Deegan <tim@xxxxxxx>, "ian.jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <ian.jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Yang Z Zhang <yang.z.zhang@xxxxxxxxx>, Tiejun Chen <tiejun.chen@xxxxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 08:44:00 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xen.org>
>>> On 20.01.15 at 01:52, <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> We may make a reasonable simplification to treat all RMRRs <1MB as
> conflicts (all real observations so far are in BIOS region).
I'm not really agreeing to this, in particular because of you (once
again) dropping the distinction between BIOS resident and init-time
regions. Avoiding conflicts with the non-resident part of it ought
to be possible, as said before.
Jan
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
