Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC PATCH v2] xen: free_domheap_pages: delay page scrub to idle loop

[Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 10:15:31AM +0800, Bob Liu wrote:
> Because of page scrub, it's very slow to destroy a domain with large
> memory.
> It took around 10 minutes when destroy a guest of nearly 1 TB of memory.
> 
> [root@ca-test111 ~]# time xm des 5
> real    10m51.582s
> user    0m0.115s
> sys     0m0.039s
> [root@ca-test111 ~]#
> 
> There are two meanings to improve this situation.
> 1. Delay the page scrub in free_domheap_pages(), so that 'xl destroy xxx' can
> return earlier.
> 
> 2. But the real scrub time doesn't get improved a lot, we should consider put 
> the
> scrub job on all idle cpus in parallel. An obvious solution is add page to
> a global list during free_domheap_pages(), and then whenever a cpu enter
> idle_loop() it will try to isolate a page and scrub/free it.
> Unfortunately this solution didn't work as expected in my testing, because
> introduce a global list which also means we need a lock to protect that list.
> The cost is too heavy!

You can introduce a per-cpu list which does not need a global lock.

The problem is with insertion of items in it - that would require an IPI
which would then need to take the global lock and populate the local CPU
list.

Interestingly, this is what I had been working on to convert the
tasklets in per-cpu tasklets.

> 
> So I use a percpu scrub page list in this patch, the tradeoff is we may not 
> use
> all idle cpus. It depends on free_domheap_pages() runs on which cpu.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bob Liu <bob.liu@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  xen/arch/x86/domain.c   |    1 +
>  xen/common/page_alloc.c |   32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  xen/include/xen/mm.h    |    1 +
>  3 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/domain.c b/xen/arch/x86/domain.c
> index 6fddd4c..f3f1260 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/domain.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/domain.c
> @@ -119,6 +119,7 @@ static void idle_loop(void)
>          (*pm_idle)();

I would actually do it _right_ before we call the pm_idle. As in
right before we go in C states instead of after we have been woken up -
as that means:
 a) the timer expires, so a guest needs to be woken up - and we do not
    want to take use its timeslice to scrub some other guest memory.
 b). an interrupt that needs to be processed. (do_IRQ gets called,
    does it stuff, setups the right softirq bits and then exits which
    resumes).

>          do_tasklet();
>          do_softirq();
> +        scrub_free_pages();
>      }
>  }
>  
> diff --git a/xen/common/page_alloc.c b/xen/common/page_alloc.c
> index 601319c..b2a0fc5 100644
> --- a/xen/common/page_alloc.c
> +++ b/xen/common/page_alloc.c
> @@ -79,6 +79,8 @@ PAGE_LIST_HEAD(page_offlined_list);
>  /* Broken page list, protected by heap_lock. */
>  PAGE_LIST_HEAD(page_broken_list);
>  
> +DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct page_list_head , page_scrub_list);
> +
>  /*************************
>   * BOOT-TIME ALLOCATOR
>   */
> @@ -633,6 +635,9 @@ static struct page_info *alloc_heap_pages(
>                      goto found;
>          } while ( zone-- > zone_lo ); /* careful: unsigned zone may wrap */
>  
> +        if ( scrub_free_pages() )
> +            continue;
> +
>          if ( memflags & MEMF_exact_node )
>              goto not_found;
>  
> @@ -1417,6 +1422,23 @@ void free_xenheap_pages(void *v, unsigned int order)
>  #endif
>  
>  
> +unsigned long scrub_free_pages(void)
> +{
> +    struct page_info *pg;
> +    unsigned long nr_scrubed = 0;
> +
> +    /* Scrub around 400M memory every time */

Could you mention why 400M? 
> +    while ( nr_scrubed < 100000 )
> +    {
> +        pg = page_list_remove_head( &this_cpu(page_scrub_list) );
> +        if (!pg)
> +            break;
> +        scrub_one_page(pg);
> +        free_heap_pages(pg, 0);
> +        nr_scrubed++;
> +    }
> +    return nr_scrubed;
> +}
>  
>  /*************************
>   * DOMAIN-HEAP SUB-ALLOCATOR
> @@ -1564,8 +1586,15 @@ void free_domheap_pages(struct page_info *pg, unsigned 
> int order)
>           * domain has died we assume responsibility for erasure.
>           */
>          if ( unlikely(d->is_dying) )
> +        {
> +            /*
> +             * Add page to page_scrub_list to speed up domain destroy, those
> +             * pages will be zeroed later by scrub_page_tasklet.
> +             */
>              for ( i = 0; i < (1 << order); i++ )
> -                scrub_one_page(&pg[i]);
> +                page_list_add_tail( &pg[i], &this_cpu(page_scrub_list) );
> +            goto out;
> +        }
>  
>          free_heap_pages(pg, order);
>      }
> @@ -1583,6 +1612,7 @@ void free_domheap_pages(struct page_info *pg, unsigned 
> int order)
>          drop_dom_ref = 0;
>      }
>  
> +out:
>      if ( drop_dom_ref )
>          put_domain(d);
>  }
> diff --git a/xen/include/xen/mm.h b/xen/include/xen/mm.h
> index b183189..3560335 100644
> --- a/xen/include/xen/mm.h
> +++ b/xen/include/xen/mm.h
> @@ -355,6 +355,7 @@ static inline unsigned int get_order_from_pages(unsigned 
> long nr_pages)
>  }
>  
>  void scrub_one_page(struct page_info *);
> +unsigned long scrub_free_pages(void);
>  
>  int xenmem_add_to_physmap_one(struct domain *d, unsigned int space,
>                                domid_t foreign_domid,
> -- 
> 1.7.10.4
> 

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel