Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v9] xen/grant-table: Avoid m2p_override during mapping

[Zoltan Kiss <zoltan.kiss@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On 16/02/14 18:36, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Feb 2014, Zoltan Kiss wrote:
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/xen/page.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/xen/page.h
> > index e0965ab..4eaeb3f 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/xen/page.h
> > +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/xen/page.h
> > @@ -97,16 +97,15 @@ static inline pte_t *lookup_address(unsigned long address, 
> > unsigned int *level)
> >         return NULL;
> >   }
> >
> > -static inline int m2p_add_override(unsigned long mfn, struct page *page,
> > -               struct gnttab_map_grant_ref *kmap_op)
> > -{
> > -       return 0;
> > -}
> > -
> > -static inline int m2p_remove_override(struct page *page, bool clear_pte)
> > -{
> > -       return 0;
> > -}
> > +extern int set_foreign_p2m_mapping(struct gnttab_map_grant_ref *map_ops,
> > +                                  struct gnttab_map_grant_ref *kmap_ops,
> > +                                  struct page **pages, unsigned int count,
> > +                                  bool m2p_override);
> > +
> > +extern int clear_foreign_p2m_mapping(struct gnttab_unmap_grant_ref *unmap_ops,
> > +                                    struct gnttab_map_grant_ref *kmap_ops,
> > +                                    struct page **pages, unsigned int count,
> > +                                    bool m2p_override);
> Much much better.
> The only comment I have is about this m2p_override boolean parameter.
> m2p_override is now meaningless in this context, what we really want to
> let the arch specific implementation know is whether the mapping is a
> kernel only mapping or a userspace mapping.
> Testing for kmap_ops != NULL might even be enough, but it would not
> improve the interface.
gntdev is the only user of this, the kmap_ops parameter there is:
use_ptemod ? map->kmap_ops + offset : NULL
where:
use_ptemod = !xen_feature(XENFEAT_auto_translated_physmap);
So I think we can't rely on kmap_ops to decide whether we should 
m2p_override or not.
> Is it possible to realize if the mapping is a userspace mapping by
> checking for GNTMAP_application_map in map_ops?
> Otherwise I would keep the boolean and rename it to user_mapping.
Sounds better, but as far as I see gntdev set that flag in 
find_grant_ptes, which is called only
if (use_ptemod) {
        err = apply_to_page_range(vma->vm_mm, vma->vm_start,
                                  vma->vm_end - vma->vm_start,
                                  find_grant_ptes, map);

So if xen_feature(XENFEAT_auto_translated_physmap), we don't have 
kmap_ops, and GNTMAP_application_map is not set as well, but I guess we 
still need m2p_override. Or not? I'm a bit confused, maybe because of 
Monday ...
Zoli

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel