|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 2/6] xen/arm: track the state of guest IRQs
On Thu, 12 Dec 2013, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-12-12 at 15:17 +0000, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
>
> > > > + set_int = 1;
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > + clear_bit(GIC_IRQ_GUEST_VISIBLE, &p->status);
> > > > +
> > > > + if ( !list_empty(&v->arch.vgic.lr_pending) ) {
> > > > + p2 = list_entry(v->arch.vgic.lr_pending.next, typeof(*p2),
> > > > lr_queue);
> > > > + gic_set_lr(i, p2->irq, GICH_LR_PENDING, p2->priority);
> > > > + list_del_init(&p2->lr_queue);
> > > > + set_bit(i, &this_cpu(lr_mask));
> > > > + set_int = 1;
> > > > + }
> > > > + spin_unlock_irq(&gic.lock);
> > > > +
> > > > + spin_lock_irq(&v->arch.vgic.lock);
> > > > list_del_init(&p->inflight);
> > > > spin_unlock_irq(&v->arch.vgic.lock);
> > > >
> > > > @@ -931,6 +955,12 @@ static void maintenance_interrupt(int irq, void
> > > > *dev_id, struct cpu_user_regs *r
> > > >
> > > > i++;
> > > > }
> > > > + if ( !set_int )
> > > > + {
> > > > + spin_lock_irq(&gic.lock);
> > >
> > > Dropping the lock and then retaking it here is a bit of a suspicious
> > > pattern -- what if something changes in the interim?
> >
> > Vcpu A has EOIed a guest IRQ, causing a maintenance_interrupt.
> > At the same time vcpu B is trying to inject a new interrupt into the
> > vcpu A.
> >
> >
> > A: maintenance_interrupt: set_int = 0
> > B: create a new inflight irq for A
> > B: send an IPI
> > A: receive an IPI
> > A: gic_inject->gic_inject_irq_start
> > A: maintenance_interrupt: gic_inject_irq_stop
> > A: gic_inject->gic_inject_irq_start
> >
> >
> > It works! :)
>
> What is the last "A: gic_inject->gic_inject_irq_start" from?
leave_hypervisor_tail->gic_inject->gic_inject_irq_start
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |