|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 2/6] xen/arm: track the state of guest IRQs
On Thu, 2013-12-12 at 15:17 +0000, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > > + set_int = 1;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + clear_bit(GIC_IRQ_GUEST_VISIBLE, &p->status);
> > > +
> > > + if ( !list_empty(&v->arch.vgic.lr_pending) ) {
> > > + p2 = list_entry(v->arch.vgic.lr_pending.next, typeof(*p2),
> > > lr_queue);
> > > + gic_set_lr(i, p2->irq, GICH_LR_PENDING, p2->priority);
> > > + list_del_init(&p2->lr_queue);
> > > + set_bit(i, &this_cpu(lr_mask));
> > > + set_int = 1;
> > > + }
> > > + spin_unlock_irq(&gic.lock);
> > > +
> > > + spin_lock_irq(&v->arch.vgic.lock);
> > > list_del_init(&p->inflight);
> > > spin_unlock_irq(&v->arch.vgic.lock);
> > >
> > > @@ -931,6 +955,12 @@ static void maintenance_interrupt(int irq, void
> > > *dev_id, struct cpu_user_regs *r
> > >
> > > i++;
> > > }
> > > + if ( !set_int )
> > > + {
> > > + spin_lock_irq(&gic.lock);
> >
> > Dropping the lock and then retaking it here is a bit of a suspicious
> > pattern -- what if something changes in the interim?
>
> Vcpu A has EOIed a guest IRQ, causing a maintenance_interrupt.
> At the same time vcpu B is trying to inject a new interrupt into the
> vcpu A.
>
>
> A: maintenance_interrupt: set_int = 0
> B: create a new inflight irq for A
> B: send an IPI
> A: receive an IPI
> A: gic_inject->gic_inject_irq_start
> A: maintenance_interrupt: gic_inject_irq_stop
> A: gic_inject->gic_inject_irq_start
>
>
> It works! :)
What is the last "A: gic_inject->gic_inject_irq_start" from?
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |