|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH V1 27/29] xen/dts: device_get_reg: cells are 32 bits big endian value
On 09/09/2013 12:57 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-08-28 at 15:47 +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
>> Device tree cells are 32-bit big endian value. Use __be32 to avoid confusion
>> later.
>
> These are only used by sparse, right? So we wouldn't expect this to
> actually save us from any mistakes unless we make Xen support the use of
> sparse? (IOW I shouldn't rely on this and not think about this too hard
> during patch review because the compiler will get it right for me)
Rigth. I think it also helps the developer to know that value may not
have the same endianess as the processor.
>> Also replace get_val call by dt_next_cell.
>
> Would prefer this separately.
>
>> Signed-off-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Acked-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>
> (on both patches if you split)
I will split the patch in 2 parts.
>
>> ---
>> xen/common/device_tree.c | 28 +++++++---------------------
>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/xen/common/device_tree.c b/xen/common/device_tree.c
>> index b120585..4bc1ce4 100644
>> --- a/xen/common/device_tree.c
>> +++ b/xen/common/device_tree.c
>> @@ -154,25 +154,11 @@ static bool_t __init device_tree_node_compatible(const
>> void *fdt, int node,
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> -static void __init get_val(const u32 **cell, u32 cells, u64 *val)
>> -{
>> - *val = 0;
>> -
>> - if ( cells > 2 )
>> - early_panic("dtb value contains > 2 cells\n");
>> -
>> - while ( cells-- )
>> - {
>> - *val <<= 32;
>> - *val |= fdt32_to_cpu(*(*cell)++);
>> - }
>> -}
>> -
>> -static void __init device_tree_get_reg(const u32 **cell, u32 address_cells,
>> +static void __init device_tree_get_reg(const __be32 **cell, u32
>> address_cells,
>> u32 size_cells, u64 *start, u64
>> *size)
>> {
>> - get_val(cell, address_cells, start);
>> - get_val(cell, size_cells, size);
>> + *start = dt_next_cell(address_cells, cell);
>> + *size = dt_next_cell(size_cells, cell);
>> }
>>
>> void dt_get_range(const __be32 **cell, const struct dt_device_node *np,
>> @@ -327,7 +313,7 @@ static void __init process_memory_node(const void *fdt,
>> int node,
>> const struct fdt_property *prop;
>> int i;
>> int banks;
>> - const u32 *cell;
>> + const __be32 *cell;
>> paddr_t start, size;
>> u32 reg_cells = address_cells + size_cells;
>>
>> @@ -345,7 +331,7 @@ static void __init process_memory_node(const void *fdt,
>> int node,
>> return;
>> }
>>
>> - cell = (const u32 *)prop->data;
>> + cell = (const __be32 *)prop->data;
>> banks = fdt32_to_cpu(prop->len) / (reg_cells * sizeof (u32));
>>
>> for ( i = 0; i < banks && early_info.mem.nr_banks < NR_MEM_BANKS; i++ )
>> @@ -396,7 +382,7 @@ static void __init process_multiboot_node(const void
>> *fdt, int node,
>> u32 address_cells, u32 size_cells)
>> {
>> const struct fdt_property *prop;
>> - const u32 *cell;
>> + const __be32 *cell;
>> int nr;
>> struct dt_mb_module *mod;
>> int len;
>> @@ -418,7 +404,7 @@ static void __init process_multiboot_node(const void
>> *fdt, int node,
>> early_panic("fdt: node `%s': `reg` property length is too short\n",
>> name);
>>
>> - cell = (const u32 *)prop->data;
>> + cell = (const __be32 *)prop->data;
>> device_tree_get_reg(&cell, address_cells, size_cells,
>> &mod->start, &mod->size);
>>
>
>
--
Julien Grall
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |