[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v8 2/2] xen/arm: trap guest WFI

To: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 12:05:40 +0100
Cc: Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Tim \(Xen.org\)" <tim@xxxxxxx>, "keir.xen@xxxxxxxxx" <keir.xen@xxxxxxxxx>, "JBeulich@xxxxxxxx" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 11:06:04 +0000
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xen.org>

On Tue, 2013-04-23 at 11:48 +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:

> I can remove both, but I would need to add a comment somewhere else
> saying that evtchn_upcall_mask is going to be removed.
> Where do you think is the right place for it?

I'm working on such a patch now, will that help?



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v8 2/2] xen/arm: trap guest WFI
  - From: Stefano Stabellini

References:
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH v8 2/2] xen/arm: trap guest WFI
  - From: Stefano Stabellini
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v8 2/2] xen/arm: trap guest WFI
  - From: Ian Campbell
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v8 2/2] xen/arm: trap guest WFI
  - From: Stefano Stabellini

Prev by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] arm: network throughput decreases 5Mbps (Arndale Exynos5250)
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v8 2/2] xen/arm: trap guest WFI
Previous by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v8 2/2] xen/arm: trap guest WFI
Next by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v8 2/2] xen/arm: trap guest WFI
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.