[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v8 2/2] xen/arm: trap guest WFI
On Mon, 2013-04-22 at 18:42 +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > +static inline int _local_events_need_delivery(void) Can we call this local_events_need_delivery_nomask or something to make it clear why it is special (which the leading _ doesn't really do). > +{ > + struct pending_irq *p = irq_to_pending(current, > VGIC_IRQ_EVTCHN_CALLBACK); > + > + /* XXX: if the first interrupt has already been delivered, we should > + * check whether any higher priority interrupts are in the > + * lr_pending queue or in the LR registers and return 1 only in that > + * case. > + * In practice the guest interrupt handler should run with > + * interrupts disabled so this shouldn't be a problem in the general > + * case. > + */ > + if ( gic_events_need_delivery() ) > + return 1; > + > + if ( vcpu_info(current, evtchn_upcall_pending) && > + !vcpu_info(current, evtchn_upcall_mask) && I don't think you need this upcall_mask check. > + list_empty(&p->inflight) ) > + return 1; > + > + return 0; > +} > + > static inline int local_events_need_delivery(void) > { > - /* TODO > - * return (vcpu_info(v, evtchn_upcall_pending) && > - !vcpu_info(v, evtchn_upcall_mask)); */ > + struct cpu_user_regs *regs = guest_cpu_user_regs(); > + > + /* guest IRQs are masked */ > + if ( (regs->cpsr & PSR_IRQ_MASK) ) > return 0; > + return _local_events_need_delivery(); > } > > int local_event_delivery_is_enabled(void); > > -static inline void local_event_delivery_disable(void) > -{ > - /* TODO current->vcpu_info->evtchn_upcall_mask = 1; */ > -} > - > static inline void local_event_delivery_enable(void) > { > /* TODO current->vcpu_info->evtchn_upcall_mask = 0; */ No reason to leave this TODO IMHO. Ian. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |