[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86/S3: Fix cpu pool scheduling after suspend/resume

  • To: Ben Guthro <benjamin.guthro@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Juergen Gross <juergen.gross@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2013 15:12:36 +0200
  • Cc: "Fraser, Keir" <keir.xen@xxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Delivery-date: Tue, 09 Apr 2013 13:17:00 +0000
  • Domainkey-signature: s=s1536a; d=ts.fujitsu.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=X-SBRSScore:X-IronPort-AV:Received:X-IronPort-AV: Received:Received:Message-ID:Date:From:Organization: User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=gQwKeoEI4fsISHofhflZTI2p+gQsKjLj+DDpHe+Wzut3ks8mstINA05t yShS+xzKyr3UThHJ2s4kAWbEG1dOuvO280YYG8HVTUPWZzJPFwA2jtVzr BD0oDsXmY+bhDp0zeYEyydHcXMbb5PYSqqE+deNiaJ4YsJliMtv8Feuke fN5rxHQQRw9BUNpRflTM9PW6LWNcCYmCiHSqkyN2B3vY/0X0qqSdjoOnY K3FRHRV0GeskQIAF8ogrSvtmyJBdS;
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xen.org>

On 09.04.2013 15:04, Ben Guthro wrote:
How would you suggest this be solved then - because we are seeing that
all non-boot cpus are not being put in a pool at all - which is
clearly worse than being put into pool0

I proposed a patch before, which should have worked:


Keir didn't like it and came up with the state variable...


Juergen Gross                 Principal Developer Operating Systems
PBG PDG ES&S SWE OS6                   Telephone: +49 (0) 89 3222 2967
Fujitsu Technology Solutions              e-mail: juergen.gross@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Domagkstr. 28                           Internet: ts.fujitsu.com
D-80807 Muenchen                 Company details: ts.fujitsu.com/imprint.html

Xen-devel mailing list



Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.