[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] Consequence of FLushing TLB with IRQ Enable

To: akshay st <akshayts@xxxxxxxxxxx>
From: George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2013 12:35:14 +0100
Cc: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Tue, 09 Apr 2013 11:38:01 +0000
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xen.org>

On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 4:59 PM, akshay st <akshayts@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi,
> I wanted to know if its safe to FLUSH TLB with IRQ Enable. Basically If i 
> call local_flush_tlb_all() with IRQ's Enabled what is the consequence? How is 
> it normally done in Linux/Xen.

Did you look through the source code to try to find out what Xen or Linux does?

 -George

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Xen-devel] Consequence of FLushing TLB with IRQ Enable
  - From: akshay st

References:
- [Xen-devel] Consequence of FLushing TLB with IRQ Enable
  - From: akshay st

Prev by Date: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 7/7] xen-netback: don't disconnect frontend when seeing oversize packet
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] Modifying xc_save and xc_restore
Previous by thread: [Xen-devel] Consequence of FLushing TLB with IRQ Enable
Next by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] Consequence of FLushing TLB with IRQ Enable
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.