|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] strange cpu number from xm info
On 04/07/2012 03:39 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-04-06 at 21:01 +0100, Zhigang Wang wrote:
>> On 04/06/2012 03:52 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>>>> Zhigang Wang <zhigang.x.wang@xxxxxxxxxx> 04/06/12 2:45 PM >>>
>>>> nr_cpus : 8
>>>> nr_nodes : 1
>>>> cores_per_socket : 4
>>>> threads_per_core : 1
>>>>
>>>> I thought nr_cpus = nr_nodes * cores_per_socket * threads_per_core
>>> nr_cpus = nr_nodes * sockets_per_node * cores_per_socket * threads_per_core
>> It seems on xm/xl info we don't show how many sockets_per_node. Can we do
>> that
>> in the future?
> We can and should. Are you able to send a patch for xl at least?
>
>
Here is another case:
# xm info
...
nr_cpus : 48
nr_nodes : 8
cores_per_socket : 12
threads_per_core : 1
This HP BL685 G7 (4 socket x 12 cores).
Actually sockets_per_node = 0.5. Xen calculates it correctly.
Should we should s 0.5 for sockets_per_node? Or just ignore sockets_per_node?
Thanks,
Zhigang
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |